Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Nokian Snowproof 3P
Ahead in each discipline
The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 and the Nokian Snowproof 3P have met in one independent test so far, and the Snowproof 3P finished ahead. The EUROWINTER HS02 was stronger in comfort, the Snowproof 3P in dry, wet, snow and value.
Performance profile
17 measurements from the one shared test, each tire shown as its share of the better figure.
Where each is furthest ahead
EUROWINTER HS02
Snowproof 3P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
EUROWINTER HS02
Snowproof 3P
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Both tires' figures from the one test that ran them together, on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The bar grows towards the tire that did better.
| Measurement | EUROWINTER HS02 | Gap | Snowproof 3P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Snowproof 3P ahead | |||
| Dry Braking ft | 145 | 2.5% | 141 |
| Dry Handling mph | 73.1 | 0.3% | 72.9 |
| Subj. Dry Handling pts | 7.3 | 9.6% | 8 |
| Wet Snowproof 3P ahead | |||
| Wet Braking ft | 112 | 5% | 106 |
| Wet Handling mph | 45.5 | 7.1% | 48.7 |
| Subj. Wet Handling pts | 6 | 66.7% | 10 |
| Wet Circle mph | 17 | 4.6% | 17.8 |
| Straight Aqua mph | 48 | 5% | 50.5 |
| Curved Aquaplaning ft/s² | 8.8 | 9.3% | 9.6 |
| Snow Snowproof 3P ahead | |||
| Snow Braking ft | 91 | 6.5% | 85 |
| Snow Traction lbf | 0 | 2.4% | 0 |
| Snow Handling mph | 52.8 | 1.9% | 53.7 |
| Subj. Snow Handling pts | 6 | 50% | 9 |
| Snow Slalom ft/s² | 12.3 | = | 12.3 |
| Comfort EUROWINTER HS02 ahead | |||
| Subj. Comfort pts | 7 | 16.7% | 6 |
| Noise dB | 69 | = | 69 |
| Value Snowproof 3P ahead | |||
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 9.2 | 5.4% | 8.7 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared.
Head to head in 1 test in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | EUROWINTER HS02 | Field | Snowproof 3P |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test | P7 of 9 | P2 of 9 |
EUROWINTER HS02 vs Snowproof 3P: your questions
Is the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 or the Nokian Snowproof 3P the better tire?
The Falken EUROWINTER HS02 and the Nokian Snowproof 3P have met in one independent test so far, and the Snowproof 3P finished ahead. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the EUROWINTER HS02 scores 8.2 and the Snowproof 3P 9.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the EUROWINTER HS02 or the Snowproof 3P?
The Snowproof 3P led 6 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The Snowproof 3P led 2 of the 3 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Snowproof 3P led 3 of the 5 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9/10 for the EUROWINTER HS02 and 7/10 for the Snowproof 3P.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the EUROWINTER HS02 82% from 3 reviews and the Snowproof 3P 90% from 1.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The EUROWINTER HS02 is made in 72 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Snowproof 3P in 50 (17 to 21 inch). 6 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the EUROWINTER HS02 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Snowproof 3P B and C.
Which is the newer tire?
The Snowproof 3P is the newer design: it reached the market in 2026, the EUROWINTER HS02 in 2022. The EUROWINTER HS02 replaced the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Michelin Alpin 7 vs Nokian Snowproof 3P
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Nokian Snowproof 3P
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Nokian Snowproof 3P
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Nokian Snowproof 3P
3-0 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.