BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Dunlop All Season 2

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tires directly!

While it might look like the Dunlop All Season 2 is better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

• Best-in-test consistency for dry braking across all shared tests
• Strong snow performance (traction, handling, slalom) with short snow stops
• Good straight-line aquaplaning resistance and lower interior noise
• Slight fuel-use edge in multiple tests

Dunlop All Season 2

• Stronger wet performance (braking, handling, curved aquaplaning)
• Outstanding tread life and abrasion, leading to lower cost per 1,000 km
• Balanced all-round capability with few major weaknesses
• Competitive rolling resistance and environmental score

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Dunlop All Season 2.

In total the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tire 0% overall.

The Dunlop All Season 2 has been reviewed 6 times and drivers have given the tire 78% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Dunlop All Season 2.

Conclusion

Patterns are clear: BFGoodrich dominates dry braking in every test and is notably confident on snow (traction, handling, slalom), with competitive aquaplaning resistance and low cabin noise. Its weakness is the wet-braking and lateral grip trail Dunlop in most measurements. Dunlop flips that script: it's reliably better in wet braking, wet handling, and curved aquaplaning, while also delivering class-leading mileage and lower overall cost per 1,000 km.
For drivers prioritizing wet-weather safety and long service life, Dunlop All Season 2 is the safer, cheaper long-term bet. For those who value short dry stops, crisp dry handling, and robust winter traction without stepping up to a dedicated winter tire, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season fits well. The practical takeaway: pick BFGoodrich for dry/snow assurance; pick Dunlop for wet-road confidence and wallet-friendly longevity.

Key Differences

• Dry braking: BFGoodrich consistently shorter (e.g., −6-9% vs Dunlop in multiple tests)
• Wet braking/handling: Dunlop leads (e.g., −2.9 to −3.7% wet braking; better wet handling/circle)
• Snow: BFGoodrich stronger in traction/handling; Dunlop slightly better on ice braking
• Aquaplaning: BFGoodrich better straight, Dunlop better in curved scenarios
• Noise: BFGoodrich quieter by around 0.9 dB in AutoBild; marginally quieter in ADAC
• Value and longevity: Dunlop massively better wear (+36-50%) and cost per 1,000 km

Overall Winner: Dunlop All Season 2

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Dunlop All Season 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Dunlop All Season 2 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.