BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Dunlop All Season 2

Across tests, BFGoodrich consistently stops shorter on dry and feels more composed there, while also delivering notably strong snow traction and stable snow handling. Dunlop counters with better wet braking/handling balance and a huge advantage in projected mileage and cost-per-1,000 km, resulting in stronger long-term value. The gaps that matter: BFGoodrich's clear dry-brake lead and snow traction edge versus Dunlop's decisive wear and value dominance, with Dunlop also nipping ahead on wet and ice braking.
If you drive mostly temperate city/motorway miles and value low running costs, Dunlop is the safer bet thanks to its very long tread life and solid wet-road performance. If precise dry-road stopping and winter confidence are higher priorities-especially in mixed or frequent snow-BFGoodrich is the more reassuring choice. The practical takeaway: choose Dunlop to spend less over the tire's life, choose BFGoodrich to stop shorter on dry and bite harder in snow.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

---

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.