Menu

Semperit Speed Grip 3 - Test Results

Test Statistics

11

Tests Completed

8th

Average Position

3rd

Best Result

15th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Semperit Speed Grip 3 - Official Image

Semperit Speed Grip 3 delivers balanced winter performance with standout wet grip and commendable efficiency, but it struggles for consistency on snow and often lags in dry braking. Across 11 winter tests it averages mid-pack (7.5th), with several top-tier finishes driven by strong wet braking/handling and low noise/rolling resistance, yet offset by recurring weaknesses in aquaplaning and dry stop distances.
Overall, it's a safe, value-oriented winter choice for wet, mixed conditions and comfort, but not a leader on snow precision or dry braking. Competitive wear and pricing occasionally boost its results, though ADAC scores indicate variability in tougher comparative fields.

Performance Strengths
  • Wet Weather Performance Strong
    • 2nd place wet braking in 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Test (+1.7% from best)
    • 3rd place wet handling in 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Test (+0.1% from best)
    • Top-10 wet braking in 2021 Auto Bild Market Overview (8/49, +9.3%)
    • 9/22 wet braking in 2021 Auto Bild full test (+9.4%)
  • Rolling Resistance & Efficiency Moderate
    • 2/10 rolling resistance in 2017 AMS (+6.5% from best)
    • 6/21 rolling resistance in 2017 Auto Bild (+11%)
    • 9/20 rolling resistance in 2020 Auto Bild (+17.7%)
  • Noise/Comfort Moderate
    • 1/10 noise in 2017 AMS (quietest on test)
    • 10/22 noise in 2021 Auto Bild (+2.3% from best)
  • Wear & Value Moderate
    • 5/20 wear in 2020 Auto Bild Performance (43050 km, +10.3%)
    • 7/20 wear in 2019 Auto Bild (41410 km, +19.2%)
    • Value 7/20 in 2020 Auto Bild Performance (Price/1000 12.08, +16%)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Braking Strong
    • 18/22 dry braking in 2021 Auto Bild (+28.5%)
    • 10/21 dry braking in 2020 Auto Bild Performance (+19.1%)
    • 18/21 dry braking in 2019 Auto Bild (+21.1%)
    • 15/21 dry braking in 2017 Auto Bild (+20.3%)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Strong
    • 20/21 straight aquaplaning in 2020 Auto Bild Performance (+11.4%)
    • 17/20 straight aquaplaning in 2019 Auto Bild (+14.4%)
    • 15/21 straight aquaplaning in 2017 Auto Bild (+7.3%)
    • 14/22 straight aquaplaning in 2021 Auto Bild (+9.5%)
  • Snow Performance Consistency Moderate
    • 19/21 snow braking in 2020 Auto Bild Performance (+7%)
    • 17/21 snow handling in 2020 Auto Bild Performance (+3.1%)
    • 18/21 snow handling in 2021 Auto Bild (+5.2%)
    • Strength spikes: 3/10 snow handling in 2017 AMS (+0.2% from best) and 3/20 snow handling in 2019 Auto Bild (+0.1%) show inconsistency
  • Overall Competitiveness in ADAC Fields Strong
    • 15/16 overall in 2018 ADAC
    • 13/15 overall in 2020 ADAC
Performance Over Time

Test History

9
of 22
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

2021
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870

8
of 49
2021 Winter Tire Market Overview

2021
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

13
of 15
2020 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

9
of 21
2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tire Test

2020
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

Strong:
Wet Braking
Weak:
Straight Aqua
3
of 49
2020 Winter Tire Market Overview - 52 Tire Braking Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Strong:
Wet Braking
8
of 21
2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tire Test

2019
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

Good
4
of 47
2019 Winter Tire Test Market Overview

2019
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

15
of 16
2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

6
of 45
2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out

2017
Winner: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

5
of 21
2017 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

Good.
3
of 10
2017 AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tire Test

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

Recommended
Strong:
Noise, Snow Handling, Rolling Resistance
Weak:
Straight Aqua