Menu

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect Test Results

2022 3 publications

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect averages a finish of 5th.

  • 3Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 2Podium finishes
  • 5thAverage finish
  • 25%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

3 tests in 2022

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 25%
The latest test

2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tire Test P8 of 11

The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect (240) was easy to trust with a neutral-to-understeer balance, but its lap times put it in the middle of the field rather than near the front.

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Record by discipline

Where the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P6.5 of 8 26% -
Dry Handling 3 P5 of 9 49% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P5 of 8 51% -
Wet Handling 2 P5.5 of 8 41% -
Wet Circle 1 P8 of 10 22% -
Straight Aqua 1 P7 of 10 33% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P3 of 10 78% -
Comfort
Noise 1 P3 of 10 78% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P3 of 10 78% -

Against its own line

The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.

Against its own line
Tire Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Predecessor 12 5 2nd 77%
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect This tire 3 0 5th 25%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 2 tests. Updated March 27, 2026.

Across two 2022 summer performance tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect consistently finishes around the podium (3rd in a 6-tire track-day test and 3rd in a 10-tire UHP/UUHP/semi-slick comparison), indicating strong overall pace for a track-focused tire. Its clearest dynamic strength is dry handling speed and consistency, while secondary positives appear in refinement/efficiency metrics (noise and rolling resistance) where measured.

The main performance concerns are braking-especially dry braking relative to its outright handling pace-and highly variable wet performance depending on the test, with one result showing competitive wet braking but another showing a large deficit. Cost is also a clear drawback, with the highest price in the Sport Auto test by a wide margin, which materially hurts value even when dynamic performance is strong.

Performance Strengths

  • Dry Handling / Track Pace Strong
    Details
    • 3rd place dry handling in 2022 Sport Auto (133.7 km/h, +1.0% from best)
    • 4th place dry handling in 2022 Auto Bild track-day test (124.7 km/h, +5.0% from best) and overall 3rd/6
    • Article note: Michelin lap time was similar to Goodyear and showed strong consistency over laps (less degradation/understeer than Goodyear after four laps)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance (situational) Moderate
    Details
    • 3rd place curved aquaplaning in 2022 Sport Auto (2.2 m/sec2, +4.3% from best)
    • 7th place straight aquaplaning in 2022 Sport Auto (66 km/h, +5.7% from best) indicates mid-pack straight-line performance but better cornering stability in water
  • Noise / Efficiency (when measured) Moderate
    Details
    • 3rd place noise in 2022 Sport Auto (68.2 dB, +0.4% from best)
    • 3rd place rolling resistance in 2022 Sport Auto (9.4 kg/t, +11.9% from best)

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet Braking & Wet Grip Consistency Strong
    Details
    • 8th place wet braking in 2022 Sport Auto (37.5 m, +36.4% from best)
    • 8th place wet handling in 2022 Sport Auto (83.4 km/h, +7.3% from best) and 8th place wet circle (+5.6% from best)
    • Counterpoint/inconsistency: 2nd place wet braking in 2022 Auto Bild track-day test (49.2 m, +11.1% from best) and 3rd place wet handling (+2.8% from best)
  • Braking Performance (especially dry braking) Moderate
    Details
    • 9th place dry braking in 2022 Sport Auto (35.8 m, +6.9% from best)
    • 4th place dry braking in 2022 Auto Bild track-day test (32.9 m, +14.2% from best)
  • Price / Value Strong
    Details
    • 10th (last) on price in 2022 Sport Auto: 284, +104.3% from best (most expensive tire in the test)

Every test, newest first 3

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2022 3 tests
P8 of 11 Beat 30% of the field

2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tire Test

Tire Rack 225/45 R17

The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect (240) was easy to trust with a neutral-to-understeer balance, but its lap times put it in the middle of the field rather than near the front.

WinnerBridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

P3 of 4 Beat 33% of the field

2022 Track Day Tire Test

Auto Bild Sportscars 235/35 R19

StrongWet Braking WinnerBridgestone Potenza Race

Back to the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Connect overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Michelin tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.