Menu

Kumho Winter Craft WP51 - Test Results

Test Statistics

13

Tests Completed

16th

Average Position

7th

Best Result

31st

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Kumho Winter Craft WP51 - Official Image

Across 13 winter tests, the Kumho Winter Craft WP51 shows predominantly lower-mid to bottom-tier performance with an average position of 16.4. Results cluster toward weak wet and dry performance, particularly in the 2018 AMS test where it finished last overall with bottom results in wet braking/handling and rolling resistance. Snow capability is inconsistent: it recorded some respectable snow results (e.g., top-5 snow braking/handling in AMS 2018), but also bottom finishes in other snow metrics (AutoCentrum 2017). Noise and price occasionally stand out positively, but do not offset broader dynamic deficits.
Overall, the WP51 lacks consistency against modern competitors, with recurring weaknesses in wet grip and efficiency. It has isolated bright spots in snow and comfort/value, yet repeated lower-quarter finishes and a last place in a flagship ADAC/AMS context indicate an aging pattern outclassed by newer designs.

Performance Strengths
  • Snow Performance Moderate
    • 3rd place snow braking in 2018 AMS (+3.5% from best)
    • 5th place snow handling in 2018 AMS (+2.6% from best)
  • Noise/Comfort and Value Moderate
    • 1st place noise in 2018 AMS (71.2 dB)
    • 2nd place price in 2018 AMS (+9.1% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Wet Weather Performance Strong
    • 11/11 wet braking in 2018 AMS (+24.2% from best)
    • 11/11 wet handling in 2018 AMS (+10.3% from best)
    • 32/49 wet braking in 2021 Auto Bild Market Overview (+17.8% from best)
  • Overall Competitiveness Strong
    • 16/16 overall in 2021 ADAC 15-inch test
    • 11/11 overall in 2018 AMS
    • Average overall position 16.4 across 13 tests
  • Rolling Resistance/Efficiency Moderate
    • 11/11 rolling resistance in 2018 AMS (+28.1% from best)
    • 6/8 rolling resistance in 2017 AutoCentrum (+11% from best)
  • Dry Performance Moderate
    • 11/11 dry braking in 2018 AMS (+9.8% from best)
    • 10/11 dry handling in 2018 AMS (+3.1% from best)
  • Ice/Snow Consistency Moderate
    • 8/8 snow braking and 8/8 snow traction in 2017 AutoCentrum (+7.5% and +12.7% from best)
    • 8/8 ice handling in 2017 AutoCentrum (+17.1% from best)
Performance Over Time

Test History

16
of 16
2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tire Test

2021
Winner: Dunlop Winter Response 2

31
of 49
2021 Winter Tire Market Overview

2021
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

11
of 16
2019 ADAC 185/65 R15 Winter Tire Test

2019
Winner: Dunlop Winter Response 2

Good
11
of 11
2018 AMS Winter Tire Test

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

Conditionally recommended.
Strong:
Noise, Price
Weak:
Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Rolling Resistance, Wet Braking, Wet Handling
7
of 12
2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tire Test

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

12
of 16
2018 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

23
of 52
2018 51 Winter Tire Shootout

2018
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

7
of 8
2017 AC Winter Tire Test - 185/65 R15

2017
Winner: Nokian WR D4

Weak:
Ice Handling, Snow Braking, Snow Traction
14
of 16
2017 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15

2017
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

30
of 43
2016 Winter Tire Market Overview

2016
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

15
of 19
2015 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2015
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

26
of 51
2015 Winter Tire Market Overview

2015
Winner: Dunlop Winter Response 2

10
of 14
2014 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 195/65 R15

2014
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850