Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 - Test Results
Test Statistics
23
Tests Completed3rd
Average Position1st
Best Result6th
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across 22 summer tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 delivers consistently high all-round performance with an average overall position of 2.6, including multiple test wins and frequent podiums. Its hallmark strength is wet-road capability and balanced dynamics, often pairing top-tier wet handling and strong wet braking with reliable dry composure and low rolling resistance. Awards such as overall wins (2011 Auto Express, 2012 Auto Bild, 2013 Auto Review, 2015 Auto Zeitung) and numerous top-three finishes reinforce its competitive stature over many years and sizes.
Weaknesses are limited and context-dependent. Occasional mid-pack dry braking and noise results, plus average aquaplaning in some sizes, appear in later, more demanding UHP fitments. Even when not class-leading, it remains competitive and rarely falls outside the top half, indicating dependable, well-rounded performance rather than absolute specialization.
Performance Strengths
-
Wet Weather Performance
Strong
Details
• 1st place wet handling in 2019 Sport Auto (fastest on test)
• 2nd place wet braking in 2018 Auto Bild 20" (+3.3% from best)
• Praised for excellent wet handling in 2012 Auto Bild (test winner)
-
Overall Consistency & Awards
Strong
Details
• Average overall position 2.6 across 22 tests
• 1/15 in 2012 Auto Bild ("tire without fault")
• 1/10 in 2011 Auto Express UHP
• 1/9 in 2013 Auto Review
• 1/14 in 2015 Auto Zeitung
-
Dry Handling & Subjective Balance
Moderate
Details
• 2nd place dry handling in 2019 Sport Auto (+0.7% from best)
• Strong subjective scores noted in 2012 EVO tests
• Multiple podiums: 2014 EVO 3/10, 2012 EVO Max Perf 3/10
-
Rolling Resistance/Efficiency
Moderate
Details
• 2nd place rolling resistance in 2018 Auto Bild 20" (+2.1% from best)
• ADAC 2013 note of Goodyear using less fuel than rival (vs Continental)
-
Braking Performance (Aggregate)
Moderate
Details
• 2/45 in 2012 Auto Bild 50-tire braking test
• Short dry braking praised in 2012 Auto Bild winner's notes
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry Braking Variability
Moderate
Details
• 6/8 in dry braking in 2019 Sport Auto (+4.9% from best)
• Mid-pack dry braking 2018 Auto Bild 20" (4/8, +2.8% from best)
-
Noise/Comfort
Minor
Details
• Noise 7/8 in 2019 Sport Auto (+2.5% from best)
• Only mid-field noise in 2018 Auto Bild 20" (4/8, +0.7%)
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Minor
Details
• Straight aquaplaning 5/8 in 2018 Auto Bild 20" (+7.7% from best)
• Straight aquaplaning 4/8 in 2019 Sport Auto (+6.4% from best)
Performance Over Time
Test History
2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tire Test
2019
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6
Subj. Comfort, Dry Handling, Subj. Wet Handling, Wet Handling
Noise
2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tire Test
2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Rolling Resistance, Wet Braking
2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2015 Auto Express Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tire Test
2014
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tire Test
2014
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
2013 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
2013
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2013 Auto Review Performance Summer Tire Test
2013
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test
2013
Winner: Dunlop SportMaxx RT
2012 EVO Summer Tire Test
2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero
2012 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test
2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero
2012 EVO Max Performance Tire Test
2012
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 3
2011 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tire Test
2011
2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tire Test
2011
Winner: Pirelli P Zero
2011 Subjective shootout - 255/40 R19 Max Performance Summer Tires
2011