Menu

Falken Eurowinter HS449 - Test Results

Test Statistics

15

Tests Completed

11th

Average Position

5th

Best Result

21st

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Falken Eurowinter HS449 - Official Image

The Falken Eurowinter HS449 shows mixed winter-test performance skewed toward mid-to-lower rankings, with only a few standout results. It occasionally excels in preliminary/braking-focused shootouts (notably early Auto Bild screenings) and achieves mid-pack finishes in broader comparison tests, but often slips to bottom-third placements in comprehensive European evaluations, indicating inconsistent performance across wet, dry, and snow disciplines.
Overall, its best results cluster around qualification and market-overview stages, suggesting decent braking-focused capability, while full-group tests reveal broader handling and balance limitations. Awards or top-3 finishes are absent; several bottom-tier results in 2013-2016 point to weaknesses versus contemporary rivals.

Performance Strengths
  • Braking-Focused Screening Performance Moderate
    • 5/43 in 2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tire Braking Test
    • 7/51 in 2015 Winter Tire Market Overview
  • General Mid-Pack Competitiveness in Large Fields Minor
    • 12/43 in 2016 Winter Tire Market Overview
    • 17/48 in 2014 50 Winter Tire Braking Overview
    • 21/45 in 2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out (qualified into top 30)
  • ADAC Relative Results (select sizes) Moderate
    • 6/19 in 2015 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16
    • 7/16 in 2015 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 165/70 R14
Performance Weaknesses
  • Comprehensive Group Test Performance (Overall Balance) Strong
    • 17/20 in 2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test
    • 13/18 in 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tire Test
    • 11/15 in 2012 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tire Test
  • Lower-Tier Finishes in Select Comparative Tests Strong
    • 9/10 in 2015 AMS UHP Winter Tire Test
    • 8/8 in 2013 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test
    • 13/16 in 2012 European Tire Test - 205/55 R16
  • Inconsistent Performance Over Time and Sizes Moderate
    • Range from 5/43 (2012 braking) to 21/45 (2017 shootout) and multiple bottom-third finishes 2013-2016
    • Average overall position 11.2 across 15 tests
Performance Over Time

Test History

9
of 17
2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tire Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak WS90

The Falken is a good choice for climates where wet snow and wet roads are common, because it scores better than average in the winter tire category, with Good ratings for braking in both wet and dr...
21
of 45
2017 50 Winter Tire Shoot Out

2017
Winner: BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

17
of 20
2016 AutoBild Winter Tire Test

2016
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

12
of 43
2016 Winter Tire Market Overview

2016
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860

9
of 10
2015 AMS UHP Winter Tire Test

2015
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

13
of 18
2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Winter Tire Test

2015
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

7
of 16
2015 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 165/70 R14

2015
Winner: Goodyear UltraGrip 9

6
of 19
2015 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2015
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

7
of 51
2015 Winter Tire Market Overview

2015
Winner: Dunlop Winter Response 2

17
of 48
2014 50 Winter Tire Braking Overview

2014
Winner: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

8
of 8
2013 Auto Zeitung Winter Tire Test

2013
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

The budget Falken slips up on snow and has trouble in the wet , so it can not compete with the premium tires on test
13
of 17
2013 ADAC Winter Tire Test - 185/60 R15

2013
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

Satisfactory
11
of 15
2012 Auto Bild Top 15 Winter Tire Test

2012
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

Fair
13
of 16
2012 European Tire Test - 205/55 R16

2012
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850

5
of 43
2012 Auto Bild 42 Winter Tire Braking Test

2012
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 850