Menu

Hankook iON FlexClimate vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV

Both the Hankook iON FlexClimate and Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV target the same brief: EV-specific, all-season tires that blend year-round safety with range efficiency for modern electric passenger cars. With identical intent but different executions, they've been measured in like-for-like sizes across two independent test programs, including Auto Bild's EV mini-test (245/45 R19) and a TÜV benchmark session (235/45 R18).
Across these shared tests, the Hankook consistently led every measurable safety metric-dry, wet, aquaplaning, and snow-often by meaningful margins. The Vredestein counters with a comfort-focused character and low noise, but its winter shortfall and weaker wet braking place it firmly behind the Hankook for all-weather security.
iON-FlexClimate VS Quatrac-Pro-EV

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of two total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
Hankook iON FlexClimatetwo
two wins

While it might look like the Hankook iON FlexClimate is better than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading wet safety: notably shorter wet braking (−7.6% to −16.7%) and stronger aquaplaning resistance
  • Convincing winter capability with quicker traction and shorter snow stops (up to ~18% advantage)
  • Balanced, precise handling with direct steering on dry and wet
  • Low rolling resistance for EV range without sacrificing grip
  • Comfort-oriented ride with low noise levels
  • Good general-road manners in dry and moderate wet conditions
  • Respectable lateral wet grip (TÜV ~97.8% of benchmark)
  • Energy-efficient focus with low rolling resistance characteristics

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate stopped the vehicle in 6.62% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
39.5M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
42.3M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
40M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
42.3M (+2.3M)
Hankook iON FlexClimate
39M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
42.3M (+3.3M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate was 2.36% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
110.1Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
107.5Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
110.1Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
107.5Km/H (-2.6Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate stopped the vehicle in 12.1% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
37.05M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
42.15M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
35M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
42M (+7M)
Hankook iON FlexClimate
39.1M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
42.3M (+3.2M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate was 4.29% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
74.6Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
71.4Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
74.6Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
71.4Km/H (-3.2Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate had 2.25% higher lateral wet grip than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
8m/s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
7.82m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
8m/s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
7.82m/s (-0.18m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate floated at a 9.4% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
83Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
75.2Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
80Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
71.5Km/H (-8.5Km/H)
Hankook iON FlexClimate
86Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
78.9Km/H (-7.1Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate slipped out at a 13.16% higher speed than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
3.04m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
2.64m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
3.04m/sec2
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
2.64m/sec2 (-0.4m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate stopped the vehicle in 12.48% less distance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
31.55M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
36.05M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
30M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
36.8M (+6.8M)
Hankook iON FlexClimate
33.1M
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
35.3M (+2.2M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate accelerated 12.23% faster than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
8.25s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
9.4s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
10s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
11.9s (+1.9s)
Hankook iON FlexClimate
6.5s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
6.9s (+0.4s)

Snow Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate was 10.45% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
60s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
67s
Snow handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Snow Handling [s]: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
60s
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
67s (+7s)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate was 2.79% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
53.8Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
52.3Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
53.8Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
52.3Km/H (-1.5Km/H)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Hankook iON FlexClimate was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Hankook iON FlexClimate had a 4.7% lower rolling resistance than the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

Hankook iON FlexClimate
7.1kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
7.45kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Hankook iON FlexClimate
7.1kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
7.45kg / t (+0.35kg / t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Hankook iON FlexClimate and Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV.

In total the Hankook iON FlexClimate has been reviewed 8 times and drivers have given the tire 88% overall.

The Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV has been reviewed 2 times and drivers have given the tire 81% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Hankook iON FlexClimate.

Best Review for the Hankook iON FlexClimate
Given 85% 235/45 R19 on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Fitted on a 508 SW Hybrid 225.

Previous tires were Pilot Sport 4

Tire is confidence inspiring. Grip is good and predictable. Noise level is lower than average, rid comfort is good. Can't say anything yet about wear.

They are quieter than the Pilot Sport. Comfort is better. Grip is slightly worse in the dry.

Very good overall tire so far. Can recommend it.
Helpful 1245 - tire reviewed on February 11, 2025
View all Hankook iON FlexClimate driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV
Given 90% 235/45 R18 on mostly town for 100 spirited miles
I recently purchased these tires for my Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor Long Range based on reviews of the original Quatrac tire. The EV version should theoretically be better, but time will tell. My previous tires were Michelin Pilot Sport 4 summer tires, which offered excellent grip and handling.

So far, my impressions of the Quatrac Pro EV are positive. They feel slightly softer and more comfortable, with noise levels that seem about the same. These tires don’t have the foam band on the inside like some other models.

I typically drive aggressively with Slip-Start... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 963 - tire reviewed on November 29, 2024
View all Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV driver reviews >>

Conclusion

The pattern is unequivocal: Hankook's iON FlexClimate dominates the objective data, winning both shared tests and every key safety category, including wet braking (up to 16.7% shorter) and snow performance (up to ~18% shorter snow stops). It also delivers lower rolling resistance (Auto Bild) and sharper steering, making it the more rounded EV all-season option for real-world climates.
Vredestein's Quatrac Pro EV suits drivers who value ride comfort and quietness in milder regions, but its deficits in snow and wet stopping distance make it harder to recommend as a four-season safety net. For most EV owners, especially where rain and occasional snow are realities, the Hankook is the clear, confidence-inspiring choice. If you rarely see winter and prioritize cabin refinement, the Vredestein remains a viable, comfort-led alternative.
Key Differences
  • Wet braking: Hankook stops 7-17% shorter across tests
  • Aquaplaning resistance: Hankook leads in straight (+9-12%) and curved (+15%) aquaplaning
  • Snow performance: Hankook markedly better in braking (up to ~18%), traction, and handling
  • Dry capability: Hankook shorter dry stops (5-8%) and quicker handling pace
  • Rolling resistance: Hankook advantage in Auto Bild (+4.7%) while Vredestein emphasizes efficiency and comfort
  • Driving character: Hankook is sportier and more precise; Vredestein is quieter and more comfort-biased
Hankook iON FlexClimate

Overall Winner: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook iON FlexClimate has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Hankook iON FlexClimate Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro EV Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.