Menu

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 vs General Grabber AT3

This head-to-head pits two popular all-terrain, all-season SUV/4x4 options against each other: Bridgestone's road-leaning Dueler All Terrain AT002 and General's more winter-capable Grabber AT3. Across two independent tests (ADAC 2025 and a 2024 multi-surface comparison), the tires trade blows on-road and off-road, but diverge sharply in winter capability.

The AT002 consistently shines on paved surfaces with class-leading dry braking and strong aquaplaning resistance, while the Grabber AT3 delivers the better all-round package thanks to excellent snow performance, secure wet handling, and superior refinement. If you routinely see snow, the gap is meaningful; if you prioritize on-road stability and efficiency in mixed weather with minimal snow, Bridgestone fights back convincingly.
Dueler-All-Terrain-AT002 VS Grabber-AT3

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of two total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
General Grabber AT3two
two wins

While it might look like the General Grabber AT3 is better than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading dry braking and strong dry handling
  • Exceptional aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
  • Very low rolling resistance (efficiency)
  • Good gravel performance (handling, braking, traction)
  • Excellent snow performance (braking, traction, handling)
  • Secure wet-road behavior and handling
  • Refined ride with lower noise
  • Balanced all-rounder with strong mud and sand traction

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 stopped the vehicle in 3.6% less distance than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
44.15M
General Grabber AT3
45.8M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
42.3M
General Grabber AT3
44.4M (+2.1M)
Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
46M
General Grabber AT3
47.2M (+1.2M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was 1.57% faster around a lap than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
89.2Km/H
General Grabber AT3
87.8Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
89.2Km/H
General Grabber AT3
87.8Km/H (-1.4Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 stopped the vehicle in 0.98% less distance than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
40.35M
General Grabber AT3
40.75M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
40.5M (+0.8M)
General Grabber AT3
39.7M
Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
40.2M
General Grabber AT3
41.8M (+1.6M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 was 2.34% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
75Km/H
General Grabber AT3
76.8Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
75Km/H (-1.8Km/H)
General Grabber AT3
76.8Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was 1.74% faster around a wet circle than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
13.55s
General Grabber AT3
13.79s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
13.55s
General Grabber AT3
13.79s (+0.24s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during one straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 floated at a 3.79% higher speed than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
79.1Km/H
General Grabber AT3
76.1Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
66.1Km/H
General Grabber AT3
59.4Km/H (-6.7Km/H)
Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
92.1Km/H (-0.7Km/H)
General Grabber AT3
92.8Km/H

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 slipped out at a 14.66% higher speed than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
6.14m/sec2
General Grabber AT3
5.24m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
9.39m/sec2
General Grabber AT3
7.77m/sec2 (-1.62m/sec2)
Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
2.88m/sec2
General Grabber AT3
2.71m/sec2 (-0.17m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 stopped the vehicle in 21.31% less distance than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
24.4M
General Grabber AT3
19.2M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
36M (+8.7M)
General Grabber AT3
27.3M
Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
12.8M (+1.7M)
General Grabber AT3
11.1M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 accelerated 11.93% faster than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
1.76s
General Grabber AT3
1.55s
Snow acceleration time, lower is better

Best In Snow Traction: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
1.76s (+0.21s)
General Grabber AT3
1.55s

Snow Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 had 12.97% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
3.22N
General Grabber AT3
3.7N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
3.22N (-0.48N)
General Grabber AT3
3.7N

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 was 13.91% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
55.7Km/H
General Grabber AT3
64.7Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
55.7Km/H (-9Km/H)
General Grabber AT3
64.7Km/H

Gravel Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during one gravel handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was 3.23% faster around a lap than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
65Km/H
General Grabber AT3
62.9Km/H
Gravel Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Gravel Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
65Km/H
General Grabber AT3
62.9Km/H (-2.1Km/H)

Gravel Braking

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one gravel braking tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 stopped the vehicle in 3.31% less distance than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
12.1m
General Grabber AT3
11.7m
Gravel Braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Gravel Braking: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
12.1m (+0.4m)
General Grabber AT3
11.7m

Gravel Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one gravel traction tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 had 1.48% better traction on gravel than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
3.37s
General Grabber AT3
3.32s
Gravel Acceleration in Seconds, lower is better

Best In Gravel Traction: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
3.37s (+0.05s)
General Grabber AT3
3.32s

Sand Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one sand traction tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 had 2.63% better traction in sand than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
1.85N
General Grabber AT3
1.9N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Sand Traction: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
1.85N (-0.05N)
General Grabber AT3
1.9N

Mud Traction

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one mud traction tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 had 2.13% better traction in mud than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
0.92N
General Grabber AT3
0.94N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Mud Traction: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
0.92N (-0.02N)
General Grabber AT3
0.94N

Noise

Looking at data from one tire tests, the General Grabber AT3 was better during one noise tests. On average the General Grabber AT3 measured 2.74% quieter than the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
72.9dB
General Grabber AT3
70.9dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: General Grabber AT3

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
72.9dB (+2dB)
General Grabber AT3
70.9dB

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 had a 3.23% lower rolling resistance than the General Grabber AT3.

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
9kg / t
General Grabber AT3
9.3kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
9kg / t
General Grabber AT3
9.3kg / t (+0.3kg / t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 Driver Reviews

Drivers of the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 largely report excellent wet and dry grip, confident handling, and surprisingly low noise for an all-terrain, with comfort and fuel economy close to road tires. Several praise snow and mild off-road traction and even tread wear. A minority critique notes soft sidewalls, mid-corner grip/understeer, and increased noise on older/gravel surfaces. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with road manners and wet grip as standout strengths.

Based on 9 reviews with an average rating of 82%

General Grabber AT3 Driver Reviews

Most drivers rate the General Grabber AT3 highly for its quiet ride, strong wet-road confidence, long tread life, and balanced on-/off-road capability. Many praised its snow performance (for an AT) and reliable traction on gravel, grass, and light-to-moderate trails. A minority reported weak grip on ice and limitations in deep mud or boggy grass, which is expected for an all-terrain tire. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, with durability, low noise, and everyday drivability standing out.

Based on 26 reviews with an average rating of 80%

Best Review for the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002
Given 87% 195/80 R15 on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
Early days yet but these are surprisingly quiet and comfortable on the road for what is a proper all-terrain tire. A great alternative to the Yokohama G015, which is no longer available in the 195/80R15 size. They look really good, too.
Helpful 969 - tire reviewed on March 2, 2024
View all Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the General Grabber AT3
Given 77% 235/85 R16 on mostly country roads for 13,000 average miles
Great overall tire, obviously ATs are not the best at everything but I found this one to do quite good at almost everything. Only when things get extremely muddy they obviously arent that great.They are really good in fresh powdered snow but horrible on ice. I studded them to increase snow/ice performance which worked quite well. They have been wearing really little on my solid axle 1991 G-Wagon. I did absolutely rip one sidewall though. Would i buy them again? Probably not I think the Falken Wildpeak AT is a overall better especially Winter-Performance wise but these generals are way better... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1137 - tire reviewed on December 11, 2023
View all General Grabber AT3 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Patterns across both tests are clear: the General Grabber AT3 is the safer year-round choice where winter matters, finishing 3/8 at ADAC versus the Bridgestone's 7/8 due to the AT002's pronounced snow deficit. In the 2024 test, General again ranked higher overall (3/7 vs 5/7) on the strength of snow braking (27.3 m vs 36.0 m), snow handling (+16%), and calmer manners (70.9 dB). Wet handling also favored General, though Bridgestone offset some of that with outstanding aquaplaning resistance.

Bridgestone's value lies in its road focus: best dry braking (42.3 m), sharper dry handling, stellar straight and curved aquaplaning margins (+11% and +21%), very low rolling resistance, and slightly better performance on gravel. For drivers rarely encountering snow who want crisp road behavior and efficiency, it's a strong pick. For mixed climates with regular winter use-and for those who value comfort and quiet-the Grabber AT3 is the more complete, confidence-inspiring option.
Key Differences
  • Snow capability: Grabber AT3 is vastly stronger; AT002 was weakest on snow at ADAC
  • Dry performance: AT002 stops shorter and feels sharper
  • Wet balance: Grabber handles better; AT002 resists aquaplaning better
  • Refinement: Grabber is quieter (~70.9 dB vs 72.9 dB) with better comfort
  • Efficiency: AT002 has lower rolling resistance
  • Off-road nuance: AT002 better on gravel; Grabber stronger in mud and sand
General Grabber AT3

Overall Winner: General Grabber AT3

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the General Grabber AT3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

General Grabber AT3 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.