Menu

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Toyo Celsius AS2

This head-to-head pits the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season, a touring all-season oriented toward confident year-round grip, against the Toyo Celsius AS2, a premium-touring option that emphasizes longevity and value. Both target everyday drivers, but they approach the brief differently: BFGoodrich leans into traction and braking security, while Toyo prioritizes mileage and cost-efficiency.
Across five shared tests from 2023-2025, a clear pattern emerges. BFGoodrich routinely stops shorter and steers more securely on dry, wet, and especially snowy surfaces, while the Toyo often counters with substantially better wear, lower ownership costs, and competitive aquaplaning and efficiency figures. The result is a trade-off between all-weather performance confidence and long-term value.
Advantage-All-Season VS Celsius-AS2

Test Results

Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tires directly
TireTest WinsPerformance
BFGoodrich Advantage All Seasonfour
four wins
Toyo Celsius AS2one
one wins

While it might look like the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season is better than the Toyo Celsius AS2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Consistently shorter dry and wet braking distances across most tests
  • Best-in-pair snow performance (braking, traction, handling, slalom)
  • Secure aquaplaning reserves and balanced wet handling
  • Competitive efficiency with lower rolling resistance/fuel use in several results
  • Excellent tread life and lower abrasion for long service
  • Stronger value proposition (lower cost per 1,000 km)
  • Balanced, stable dry-road behavior
  • Competitive aquaplaning resistance and generally efficient rolling

Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during four dry braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 2.67% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
39.32M
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.4M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.9M (+2M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.9M (+2M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Toyo Celsius AS2
39.9M (+1M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Toyo Celsius AS2
39.9M (+1M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
41M (+0.6M)
Toyo Celsius AS2
40.4M

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 1.14% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
92.05Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
91Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
88.2Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
87.9Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
95.9Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
94.1Km/H (-1.8Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two wet braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 2.33% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
52.78M
Toyo Celsius AS2
54.04M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
47.4M
Toyo Celsius AS2
50.6M (+3.2M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
47.4M
Toyo Celsius AS2
50.6M (+3.2M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
59M
Toyo Celsius AS2
59M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
59M
Toyo Celsius AS2
59M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
51.1M (+0.1M)
Toyo Celsius AS2
51M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 2.24% faster around a wet lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
71.3Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
69.7Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
70.8Km/H (-1.2Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
70.6Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
68.6Km/H (-2Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two wet circle tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 0.82% faster around a wet circle than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.16s
Toyo Celsius AS2
12.26s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.21s
Toyo Celsius AS2
12.26s (+0.05s)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.1s
Toyo Celsius AS2
12.26s (+0.16s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season floated at a 1.29% higher speed than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
77.65Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
76.65Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
80.4Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
78.6Km/H (-1.8Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
74.9Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
74.7Km/H (-0.2Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 slipped out at a 2.44% higher speed than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3.2m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.28m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Toyo Celsius AS2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3.31m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.31m/sec2
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3.09m/sec2 (-0.15m/sec2)
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.24m/sec2

Snow Braking

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 5.47% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
23.35M
Toyo Celsius AS2
24.7M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
22.9M
Toyo Celsius AS2
23.9M (+1M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
23.8M
Toyo Celsius AS2
25.5M (+1.7M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow traction tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had 12.7% better snow traction than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
2729N
Toyo Celsius AS2
2382.5N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
2713N
Toyo Celsius AS2
2410N (-303N)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
2745N
Toyo Celsius AS2
2355N (-390N)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 5.72% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
55.95Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
52.75Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
57.5Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
55.5Km/H (-2Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
54.4Km/H
Toyo Celsius AS2
50Km/H (-4.4Km/H)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 10.07% faster through a slalom than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.27m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.84m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.18m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.9m/sec2 (-0.28m/sec2)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.36m/sec2
Toyo Celsius AS2
3.78m/sec2 (-0.58m/sec2)

Noise

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two noise tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season measured 0.55% quieter than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72.6dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
73dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
73dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
73.3dB (+0.3dB)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72.2dB
Toyo Celsius AS2
72.7dB (+0.5dB)

Tire Weight

Looking at data from one tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one tire weight tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season weighed 5.87% less than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
35.3Kg
Toyo Celsius AS2
37.5Kg
Tire Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tire Weight: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
35.3Kg
Toyo Celsius AS2
37.5Kg (+2.2Kg)

Wear

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 is predicted to cover 25.14% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
44873.5KM
Toyo Celsius AS2
59941KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Toyo Celsius AS2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
40317KM (-15695KM)
Toyo Celsius AS2
56012KM
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
49430KM (-14440KM)
Toyo Celsius AS2
63870KM

Value

Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two value tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 proved to have a 38.16% better value based on price/1000km than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
11.66Price/1000
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.21Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Toyo Celsius AS2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.28Price/1000 (+5.23Price/1000)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.05Price/1000
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
11.03Price/1000 (+3.67Price/1000)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.36Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had a 0.39% lower rolling resistance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
7.71kg / t
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.74kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
7.7kg / t
Toyo Celsius AS2
8.1kg / t (+0.4kg / t)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
7.71kg / t (+0.33kg / t)
Toyo Celsius AS2
7.38kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season used 0.39% less fuel than the Toyo Celsius AS2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
5.16l/100km
Toyo Celsius AS2
5.18l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
5.57l/100km
Toyo Celsius AS2
5.58l/100km (+0.01l/100km)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.74l/100km
Toyo Celsius AS2
4.77l/100km (+0.03l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 lost 11.17% less particle wear matter than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
609g
Toyo Celsius AS2
541g
Total weight loss after wear test in grams, lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Toyo Celsius AS2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
609g (+68g)
Toyo Celsius AS2
541g

Real World Driver Reviews

Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Toyo Celsius AS2.

In total the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tire 0% overall.

The Toyo Celsius AS2 has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tire 79% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Toyo Celsius AS2.

Best Review for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
View all BFGoodrich Advantage All Season driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Toyo Celsius AS2
Given 48% 225/45 R17 on a combination of roads for 16,000 easy going miles
Pretty uninspiring tire. It does everything ok but didn't seem great in the wet or snow.
Helpful 1114 - tire reviewed on August 25, 2023
View all Toyo Celsius AS2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

BFGoodrich delivers the more rounded driving safety package: consistently shorter dry and wet stops, stronger snow traction and handling, and solid aquaplaning reserves. In multiple tests it out-accelerates and out-brakes the Toyo on snow by meaningful margins (e.g., ~12-17% advantage in snow traction), and typically holds a small but repeatable edge in dry braking and wet handling.
Toyo's strength is durability and cost: markedly longer tread life (circa +29-39% in wear tests) and better value scores, with competitive rolling resistance. If you drive high annual mileage in milder climates and prioritize running costs, the Celsius AS2 is compelling. If you want maximum year-round confidence, especially where winter conditions or heavy rain appear, the BFGoodrich is the safer, more reassuring choice. The practical takeaway: choose BFGoodrich for grip-first security, Toyo for wallet-first longevity.
Key Differences
  • Dry braking: BFGoodrich typically stops shorter (e.g., 38.9 m vs 39.9-40.9 m; ~2-5% advantage).
  • Wet performance: BFGoodrich usually leads in braking/handling; Toyo shows occasional parity but can trail with longer wet stops.
  • Snow capability: BFGoodrich clearly ahead (e.g., traction +12-17%; faster snow handling speeds).
  • Aquaplaning: Mostly close; BFGoodrich often edges straight-line, while Toyo has a curved aquaplaning win.
  • Wear/longevity: Toyo outlasts BFGoodrich by roughly 29-39%, with lower abrasion.
  • Value/ownership cost: Toyo scores better on price-per-1,000 km; BFGoodrich trends pricier but more confidence-inspiring.
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Overall Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Toyo Celsius AS2 Top Comparisons

No other comparisons available for this tire.

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.