BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Toyo Celsius AS2
Across five shared tests from 2023-2025, a clear pattern emerges. BFGoodrich routinely stops shorter and steers more securely on dry, wet, and especially snowy surfaces, while the Toyo often counters with substantially better wear, lower ownership costs, and competitive aquaplaning and efficiency figures. The result is a trade-off between all-weather performance confidence and long-term value.

Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | four | |
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | one |
While it might look like the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season is better than the Toyo Celsius AS2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently shorter dry and wet braking distances across most tests
- Best-in-pair snow performance (braking, traction, handling, slalom)
- Secure aquaplaning reserves and balanced wet handling
- Competitive efficiency with lower rolling resistance/fuel use in several results
- Excellent tread life and lower abrasion for long service
- Stronger value proposition (lower cost per 1,000 km)
- Balanced, stable dry-road behavior
- Competitive aquaplaning resistance and generally efficient rolling
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during four dry braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 2.67% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Dry Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 1.14% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two wet braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 2.33% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wet Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 2.24% faster around a wet lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two wet circle tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 0.82% faster around a wet circle than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Wet Circle: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season floated at a 1.29% higher speed than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Straight Aqua: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 slipped out at a 2.44% higher speed than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 5.47% less distance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow traction tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had 12.7% better snow traction than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Traction: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 5.72% faster around a lap than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 10.07% faster through a slalom than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Snow Slalom: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two noise tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season measured 0.55% quieter than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Noise: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tire Weight
Looking at data from one tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one tire weight tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season weighed 5.87% less than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Tire Weight: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 is predicted to cover 25.14% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wear: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during two value tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 proved to have a 38.16% better value based on price/1000km than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Value: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had a 0.39% lower rolling resistance than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tire tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season used 0.39% less fuel than the Toyo Celsius AS2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Toyo Celsius AS2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Toyo Celsius AS2 lost 11.17% less particle wear matter than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Abrasion: Toyo Celsius AS2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tire Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Toyo Celsius AS2.
In total the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tire 0% overall.
The Toyo Celsius AS2 has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tire 79% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Toyo Celsius AS2.
View all BFGoodrich Advantage All Season driver reviews >>
Conclusion
Toyo's strength is durability and cost: markedly longer tread life (circa +29-39% in wear tests) and better value scores, with competitive rolling resistance. If you drive high annual mileage in milder climates and prioritize running costs, the Celsius AS2 is compelling. If you want maximum year-round confidence, especially where winter conditions or heavy rain appear, the BFGoodrich is the safer, more reassuring choice. The practical takeaway: choose BFGoodrich for grip-first security, Toyo for wallet-first longevity.
Key Differences
- Dry braking: BFGoodrich typically stops shorter (e.g., 38.9 m vs 39.9-40.9 m; ~2-5% advantage).
- Wet performance: BFGoodrich usually leads in braking/handling; Toyo shows occasional parity but can trail with longer wet stops.
- Snow capability: BFGoodrich clearly ahead (e.g., traction +12-17%; faster snow handling speeds).
- Aquaplaning: Mostly close; BFGoodrich often edges straight-line, while Toyo has a curved aquaplaning win.
- Wear/longevity: Toyo outlasts BFGoodrich by roughly 29-39%, with lower abrasion.
- Value/ownership cost: Toyo scores better on price-per-1,000 km; BFGoodrich trends pricier but more confidence-inspiring.
Overall Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Toyo Celsius AS2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.