Menu

Nankang Sportnex AS2+ - Test Results

Test Statistics

8

Tests Completed

15th

Average Position

5th

Best Result

39th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus - Official Image

The Nankang Sportnex AS2 Plus shows a mixed profile: consistently strong aquaplaning resistance and competitive rolling resistance/noise, but recurring deficits in dry and wet braking plus overall grip. In UUHP-focused and broader market tests alike, it occasionally posts mid-pack to good overall results, yet typically lags on stopping distances and dry handling pace. Awards or wins are absent, and average overall positions trend lower-middle to poor across years.
Overall, the tire's hydrodynamic stability (straight and curved aquaplaning) is a clear highlight across multiple tests, complemented by low noise and acceptable efficiency. However, braking shortfalls (often 8-13% off best) and weak subjective/absolute dry handling limit its competitiveness, especially versus premium rivals.

Performance Strengths
  • Aquaplaning Resistance (Straight & Curved) Strong
    • 2nd place straight aquaplaning in 2022 (89.43 km/h, +0.7% from best)
    • 2nd place curved aquaplaning in 2022 (+4.2% from best)
    • 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2021 (91.8 km/h)
    • 2nd place straight aquaplaning in 2018 (87.2 km/h, +1.5% from best)
  • Noise/Comfort Moderate
    • 1st place noise and subjective comfort in 2022 (71.3 dB; Comfort 10/10)
    • 1st place noise in 2021 (71.2 dB)
  • Rolling Resistance / Efficiency Moderate
    • 3rd place rolling resistance in 2022 (+2% from best)
    • 4th/8 rolling resistance in 2021 (+8.4% from best)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Braking and Dry Handling Strong
    • 9/10 dry braking in 2022 (+13% from best) and 8/10 dry handling (+4.3%)
    • 8/8 dry braking in 2021 (+13.3%) and 8/8 dry handling (+3.2%); worst subjective dry (5 pts, +50%)
    • 13/13 dry braking in 2019 (+10.5%)
    • 14/16 dry braking in 2018 (+10.1%); poor subjective dry (15/16)
  • Wet Braking / Overall Wet Grip Strong
    • Wet braking mid but off best: 4/10 in 2022 (+11.5%); 6/8 in 2021 (+7%)
    • 13/13 wet braking in 2019 (+10%)
    • 15/16 wet braking in 2018 (+8.2%); wet circle 7/8 in 2021 (+6%)
  • Overall Competitive Standing Strong
    • Average overall position ~15 across 8 tests
    • 39/45 in 2019 Auto Bild braking shootout; 24/43 in 2017 Auto Bild shootout
    • 10/11 in 2017 Auto Express; 14/16 in 2018 Test World
Performance Over Time

Test History

5
of 10
2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test

2022
Winner: Continental SportContact 7

The Nankang Sportnex AS-2+ punched above its price category, beating the more established brands of Kumho and Toyo. The tire might not have been the most dynamic in the dry, but it performed well i...
Strong:
Noise, Subj. Comfort, Curved Aquaplaning, Straight Aqua
Weak:
Dry Braking
7
of 8
2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tire Test

2021
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

The low cost SportNex AS2+ just shines in aquaplaning resistance.
Strong:
Noise, Price, Straight Aqua
Weak:
Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Circle
13
of 13
2019 Swedish Summer Tire Test

2019
Winner: Nokian Hakka Blue 2

Weak:
Dry Braking, Straight Aqua, Wet Braking
39
of 45
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout

2019
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

14
of 16
2018 Test World Summer Tire Test

2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Strong:
Straight Aqua
Weak:
Noise, Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Braking
10
of 11
2017 Auto Express Summer Tire Test

2017
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 5

24
of 43
2017 Auto Bild Summer Tire Shootout

2017
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

8
of 13
2016 Test World Performance Tire Test

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5