Menu

Kleber Quadraxer 2 - Test Results

Test Statistics

9

Tests Completed

11th

Average Position

3rd

Best Result

20th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Kleber Quadraxer 2 - Official Image

The Kleber Quadraxer 2 shows a clear all-season bias toward snow capability and value, while struggling in core dry and wet braking disciplines. Across nine tests it averages mid-pack (11.1), with peak results in earlier Auto Bild tests (3rd in 2016, 4th in 2017) driven by strong snow grip, low noise, good rolling resistance, and excellent wear/value metrics. However, repeated bottom-tier finishes in dry and wet braking and mediocre aquaplaning in some years limit overall standings.
Overall, it's a competent, budget-friendly all-season option for mixed climates with regular winter conditions, but not ideal if dry or wet braking performance is a priority.

Performance Strengths
  • Snow Performance Strong
    • 2nd place snow traction and 2nd place snow handling in 2022/23 (both within ~3-4% of best)
    • 1st snow handling and 3rd snow braking in 2020 Auto Bild full test
    • 2nd snow braking in 2017 (+1.8% from best)
  • Comfort/Noise Moderate
    • 3rd of 10 for noise in 2022/23 (+0.4% from best)
    • 4th of 16 noise in 2020 (+0.4% from best)
    • 3rd of 12 noise in 2017 (+1.8% from best)
  • Value and Wear/Efficiency Moderate
    • 1st for value and 2nd for wear (48,474 km) in 2017; 2nd rolling resistance (8.09 kg/t)
    • Good value cluster in 2020 (price 4/14; value 5/14; wear 7/14, +16.4% from best)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Minor
    • Straight aquaplaning 3rd/10 and curved 4th/10 in 2022/23 (within ~2-11% of best)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Braking and Dry Handling Strong
    • 2022/23: dry braking 9/10 (+10.4%), dry handling 10/10 (+2.7%)
    • 2020: dry braking 14/16 (+10.8%), dry handling 13/16 (+2.2%)
    • 2017: dry braking 10/12 (+14%)
    • 2019 summer: dry braking 14/18 (+14.9%)
  • Wet Braking and Wet Handling Strong
    • 2022/23: wet braking 9/10 (+20.3%), wet handling 9/10 (+4.9%)
    • 2020: wet braking 13/16 (+13.8%), wet handling 11/16 (+3.9%)
    • 2019 summer: wet braking 15/18 (+23.8%)
    • 2017: wet braking 11/12 (+15.2%)
  • Qualification/Braking Shootouts Moderate
    • 2021 overview: 20/34 dry braking (+14.2%) and 22/34 wet braking (+11.8%)
    • 2020 braking shootout: 14/33 overall with mid-pack dry/wet braking (16/33 and 18/33)
Performance Over Time

Test History

9
of 10
2022/23 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test

2022
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2

The Kleber Quadraxer 2 had an excellent performance in all the snow tests and one of the best aquaplaning performances, but sadly couldn't keep up in the dry and wet grip tests where it had long br...
Strong:
Snow Handling, Snow Traction
Weak:
Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling
20
of 34
2021 All Season Tire Market Overview

2021
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2

8
of 16
2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test

2020
Winner: Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

Strong:
Snow Handling
Weak:
Straight Aqua
14
of 33
2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test

2020
Winner: Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

19
of 31
2019 All Season Tire Performance Overview

2019
Winner: Bridgestone Weather Control A005

12
of 18
2019 Summer and All Season Tire Test

2019
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4

11
of 27
2018 27 All Season Tire Shootout

2018
Winner: Bridgestone Weather Control A005

4
of 12
2017 All Season Tire Test

2017
Winner: Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2

Strong:
Snow Braking, Rolling Resistance, Value, Wear
Weak:
Wet Braking
3
of 10
2016 AutoBild All Season Tire Test

2016
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate

Satisfactory