Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 - Test Results
Test Statistics
35
Tests Completed5th
Average Position2nd
Best Result10th
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
Across 34 summer tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 delivers consistently solid upper-mid to front-pack performance (average P5), with standout results in braking, aquaplaning resistance, noise, and rolling resistance. It frequently places top three in wet braking/handling and environmental metrics, and has multiple podiums and strong showings in UHP-focused tests. However, it can slip to mid-pack in dry handling and occasionally in wet handling consistency, and has some older tests showing weaker wet performance against the latest premium rivals.
Performance Strengths
-
Wet Weather Performance
Moderate
Details
• 2nd wet braking in 2018 Sport Auto 19" (+3.8% from best); 3rd wet handling in same test (+4.1%)
• 3rd wet braking in 2018 Test World (+1.9% from best); multiple mid-top wet rankings in 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars (3rd wet braking, 6th wet handling)
-
Dry Braking
Strong
Details
• 1st dry braking in 2018 Test World (31.8 m)
• Frequent upper positions: 2nd dry braking in 2018 Auto Bild 19" (+1.4% from best)
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Moderate
Details
• 2nd straight aquaplaning in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (+5% from best)
• 2nd straight aquaplaning in 2018 Sport Auto 19" (+3.1% from best)
-
Noise/Comfort
Strong
Details
• 1st noise in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (72.9 dB)
• 1st noise in 2017 Auto Bild (71.6 dB); 2nd noise in 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car (+0.1 dB from best)
-
Rolling Resistance/Efficiency
Strong
Details
• 1st rolling resistance in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (8.31 kg/t); article: "Hankook had the lowest rolling resistance"
• 1st rolling resistance in 2018 Auto Bild 19" (8.57 kg/t)
-
Overall Test Competitiveness
Moderate
Details
• Podiums: 2/6 (2018 Auto Bild 19"), 3/9 (2018 Sport Auto 19"), 2/9 (2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars), 3/9 (2012 Sport Auto), 3/15 (2012 Auto Bild), 3/7 (2014 Auto Review)
• Strong average overall position: 5 across 34 tests
Performance Weaknesses
-
Dry Handling Consistency
Moderate
Details
• 7th dry handling in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (+3.3% from best)
• 9th dry handling in 2017 AMS (+4.2% from best)
-
Wet Handling Variability
Moderate
Details
• 7th wet handling in 2017 Auto Bild (+2.5% from best)
• 8th wet handling in 2018 Test World (+1.8% from best) despite strong wet braking
-
Rolling Resistance (some sizes/tests)
Minor
Details
• 9th rolling resistance in 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car (+23.7% from best)
• Mixed results across years despite multiple 1sts
-
Older-Generation Wet Performance vs Premium Leaders
Minor
Details
• 2016 EVO: struggled in wet handling and braking (8/9 overall)
• 2015 EVO: disappointed in the wet to finish 7/10 overall
Performance Over Time
Test History
Noise, Rolling Resistance, Straight Aqua
Noise
2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tire Test
2019
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6
2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tire Test
2018
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6
Dry Braking, Rolling Resistance
Noise
2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tire Test
2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Straight Aqua, Wet Braking
Noise
Dry Handling
2016 EVO Summer Performance Tire Test
2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6
2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2015 Auto Express Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2015 Auto Review Summer Tire Test
2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tire Test
2014
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tire Test
2014
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P
2013 Auto Express Summer Tire Test
2013
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test
2013
Winner: Dunlop SportMaxx RT
2012 EVO Summer Tire Test
2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero
2012 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test
2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero