Menu

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 - Test Results

Test Statistics

35

Tests Completed

5th

Average Position

2nd

Best Result

10th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 - Official Image

Across 34 summer tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 delivers consistently solid upper-mid to front-pack performance (average P5), with standout results in braking, aquaplaning resistance, noise, and rolling resistance. It frequently places top three in wet braking/handling and environmental metrics, and has multiple podiums and strong showings in UHP-focused tests. However, it can slip to mid-pack in dry handling and occasionally in wet handling consistency, and has some older tests showing weaker wet performance against the latest premium rivals.

Performance Strengths
  • Wet Weather Performance Moderate
    • 2nd wet braking in 2018 Sport Auto 19" (+3.8% from best); 3rd wet handling in same test (+4.1%)
    • 3rd wet braking in 2018 Test World (+1.9% from best); multiple mid-top wet rankings in 2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars (3rd wet braking, 6th wet handling)
  • Dry Braking Strong
    • 1st dry braking in 2018 Test World (31.8 m)
    • Frequent upper positions: 2nd dry braking in 2018 Auto Bild 19" (+1.4% from best)
  • Aquaplaning Resistance Moderate
    • 2nd straight aquaplaning in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (+5% from best)
    • 2nd straight aquaplaning in 2018 Sport Auto 19" (+3.1% from best)
  • Noise/Comfort Strong
    • 1st noise in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (72.9 dB)
    • 1st noise in 2017 Auto Bild (71.6 dB); 2nd noise in 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car (+0.1 dB from best)
  • Rolling Resistance/Efficiency Strong
    • 1st rolling resistance in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (8.31 kg/t); article: "Hankook had the lowest rolling resistance"
    • 1st rolling resistance in 2018 Auto Bild 19" (8.57 kg/t)
  • Overall Test Competitiveness Moderate
    • Podiums: 2/6 (2018 Auto Bild 19"), 3/9 (2018 Sport Auto 19"), 2/9 (2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars), 3/9 (2012 Sport Auto), 3/15 (2012 Auto Bild), 3/7 (2014 Auto Review)
    • Strong average overall position: 5 across 34 tests
Performance Weaknesses
  • Dry Handling Consistency Moderate
    • 7th dry handling in 2020 Auto Bild UHP (+3.3% from best)
    • 9th dry handling in 2017 AMS (+4.2% from best)
  • Wet Handling Variability Moderate
    • 7th wet handling in 2017 Auto Bild (+2.5% from best)
    • 8th wet handling in 2018 Test World (+1.8% from best) despite strong wet braking
  • Rolling Resistance (some sizes/tests) Minor
    • 9th rolling resistance in 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car (+23.7% from best)
    • Mixed results across years despite multiple 1sts
  • Older-Generation Wet Performance vs Premium Leaders Minor
    • 2016 EVO: struggled in wet handling and braking (8/9 overall)
    • 2015 EVO: disappointed in the wet to finish 7/10 overall
Performance Over Time

Test History

4
of 10
2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tire Test

2020
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6

Recommended.
Strong:
Noise, Rolling Resistance, Straight Aqua
6
of 11
2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tire Test

2019
Winner: Pirelli P Zero PZ4

Good.
Strong:
Noise
5
of 12
2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tire Test

2019
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

Highly Recommended.
8
of 10
2018 Auto Express Summer Tire Test

2018
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6

4
of 11
2018 Ace 235/45 R18 Summer Tire Test

2018
Winner: Falken Azenis FK510

7
of 16
2018 Test World Summer Tire Test

2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Strong:
Dry Braking
2
of 6
2018 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tire Test

2018
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6

Strong:
Dry Braking, Rolling Resistance
Weak:
Noise
3
of 9
2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tire Test

2018
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Strong:
Straight Aqua, Wet Braking
5
of 9
2017 Motor Mag UHP Tire Test

2017
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P

7
of 9
2017 EVO Summer Tire Test

2017
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

4
of 9
2017 Auto Bild UHP Tire Test

2017
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Good
Strong:
Noise
4
of 10
2017 AMS Summer UHP Tire Test

2017
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Recommended
Weak:
Dry Handling
2
of 9
2017 Auto Bild Sports Cars Tire Test

2017
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6

Exemplary
8
of 9
2016 EVO Summer Performance Tire Test

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6

The worst tire in the wet was saved from last place by a mid table performance i the dry. Ok on the road, but lacking elsewhere.
6
of 9
2016 Auto Express Summer Tire Test

2016
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4

5
of 13
2016 Test World Performance Tire Test

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

3
of 8
2016 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tire Test

2016
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3

Recommended
2
of 6
2016 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 6

Exemplary
9
of 14
2016 GTU Performance Summer Tire Test

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

5
of 16
2016 ADAC Tire Test - 225/45 R17

2016
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

7
of 10
2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire Test

2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

The Hankook was let down by its wet performance, and dry braking. Competitive in dry laptime.
4
of 11
2015 Auto Express Tire Test

2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

Only winning the cabin noise test, the Hankook S1 Evo 2 had a strong performance in every category, always close to the front and rarely slipping past mid table.
4
of 9
2015 Auto Review Summer Tire Test

2015
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

Every year Hankook tires are getting better and better, and with the Korean company now OE on cars like the Mercedes Benz S Class, the 'big 6' tire companies really need to watch out. The Ventus...
3
of 5
2015 Top 5 Summer Performance Tires

2015
Winner: Michelin Pilot Super Sport

3
of 7
2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP Tire Test

2015
Winner: Pirelli P Zero

8
of 10
2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tire Test

2014
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

The Hankook S1 Evo 2 had both good results, and bad. Strong in aquaplaning, and mid pack in dry handling, the tire was let down by a last place finish in wet handling and a poor score on the road r...
3
of 7
2014 Auto Review Max Performance Tire Test

2014
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P

The new Hankook S1 Evo 2 have a near flawless performance in the wet. They grip well and are backed by predictable behavior on a winding road. Though the laps are slightly slower than Goodyear and ...
10
of 11
2014 ACE Summer Tire Test

2014
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

4
of 10
2013 Auto Express Summer Tire Test

2013
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

The midrange Korean brands are finally making progress towards the premium, with a strong showing from Hankook with the Ventus S1 evo2. A string of top three results in the wet really shows how wel...
6
of 10
2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer Tire Test

2013
Winner: Dunlop SportMaxx RT

Excellent dry handling with good steering precision and an agile response. Sporty too in the wet, with a good balance. Average aquaplaning properties knock the Hankook Ventus S1 evo 2 down to 6th.
6
of 18
2013 European Summer Sports Tire Test

2013
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 5

7
of 10
2012 EVO Summer Tire Test

2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero

Not the fastest tire on test, with last place in wet braking as a test low, the Hankook S1 Evo2 never felt particularly bad, scoring well subjectively in many places
3
of 9
2012 Sport Auto Summer Tire Test

2012
Winner: Pirelli P Zero

Even after 15 consecutive fast laps the S1 Evo2 maintains a good turn in and doesn't overheat making the Hankook one of the best in dry conditions. In the wet, the performance drops a bit due to...
3
of 15
2012 Auto Bild Max Performance Tire Test

2012
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

3
of 45
2012 Autobild 50 Tire Braking Test

2012
Winner: Nokian Z G2