Menu

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A - Test Results

Test Statistics

7

Tests Completed

6th

Average Position

3rd

Best Result

10th

Worst Result

Performance Analysis

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A - Official Image

Across seven summer tests, the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A shows mixed, era-typical performance: capable of upper-midfield results in some tests but frequently trailing newer rivals. It delivers respectable dry-road competence and occasional standout wet braking, yet overall rankings skew mid-to-lower due to weaker wet handling/balance and inconsistency across sizes and test protocols. Awards or wins are absent, and variability is high, suggesting an ageing design outpaced by contemporary competitors in comprehensive scoring.

Performance Strengths
  • Wet Braking Moderate
    • 2010 Auto Express: 3rd in wet braking (close to winner; AE quote notes Bridgestone in 3rd just 25cm behind)
    • 2015 Australian Motor: overall 3rd/8 with article noting only 2 m behind leading wet reference in braking context
  • Dry Handling/Balance Moderate
    • 2010 AMS: Positive comments for good-natured, slightly understeer handling in dry; Dry score 68/200 vs Wet 59
    • 2015 Australian Motor: overall 3rd/8, beating Goodyear overall
  • General Competitiveness in Mixed Conditions Moderate
    • 2010 European ADAC/TCS/AMTC: 5th/16, noted as a strong balanced tire
    • 2010 EVO: 4th/9 (upper-midfield)
Performance Weaknesses
  • Overall Consistency vs. Premium Rivals Strong
    • Average overall position 6.4 across 7 tests
    • Bottom-tier finishes: 10/10 in 2010 AMS, 9/11 in 2010 Auto Express, 8/9 in 2011 Autoreview, 6/6 in 2010 Autocar RWD
  • Wet Handling/Overall Wet Performance Strong
    • 2010 AMS: Wet score 59/200 contributing to last place 10/10
    • Multiple low overall results (AMS 10/10, Autocar RWD 6/6) imply deficits in wet balance despite isolated wet braking strength
  • Aging Design Competitiveness Moderate
    • No test wins or top-2 finishes across 7 tests
    • Cluster of tests in 2010-2011 show frequent bottom-third results against contemporary premium tires
Performance Over Time

Test History

3
of 8
2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tire Test

2015
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P

8
of 9
2011 Autoreview Max Performance Summer Tire Test

2011
Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 5 P

For a tire which is fitted to cars like the Ferrari 430, the RE050A has a very poor result. Perhaps Bridgestone use a different compound for the Russian market as it was a full 10 metres behind the...
9
of 11
2010 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tire Test

2010
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 3

6
of 6
2010 Autocar Tire Test - RWD

2010
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 3

5
of 16
2010 European Summer Tire Test

2010
Winner: Pirelli CINTURATO P7

10
of 10
2010 AMS Premium Brand Tire Test

2010
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo

4
of 9
2010 EVO Tire Test

2010
Winner: Continental Sport Contact 3