Test Publication:
205/55 R16
22 tires
5 categories
Images courtesy of Auto Bild
Test Publication:
Images courtesy of Auto Bild
Test Size:
205/55 R16
Tires Tested:
22 tires
The 2021 Auto Bild winter tire test started its life as a
fifty tire wet and snow braking test, with the best performing twenty tires proceeding to this test. This means the twenty tires in this test are some of the best winter tires for 2021 on the market!
Additionally Auto Bild have included the usual reference summer tire, but also a budget winter tire. It wasn't clear from the article how this tire was chosen, but I imagine it was one of the worst tires from the fifty tire braking test intended to highlight just how bad cheap tires can be. The results confirm the theory, with the cheap winter tire performing well below average in nearly all tests.
The results, as always, were close at the top, with the new Continental WinterContact TS870 narrowly beating the Michelin Alpin 6. The new German tire had a very consistent test, performing well in nearly all categories, and having the best wear on test!
In joint third are the Kleber Krisalp HP3 and Vredestein Wintrac. Both these tires performed extremely well considering their "mid range" price point, and they beat the premium tires from Bridgestone, Hankook and Goodyear.
Auto Bild are one of the few publications able to do wear tests. Rather than very expensive real world wear, the wear test for this was done on a drum. As always, it highlights certain running theme in tests, Continental are up there with Michelin in wear, and Bridgestone make excellent tires with outstanding grip in the wet, especially wet braking, but it comes at the expense of treadlife.
Dry
A summer tire will nearly always beat a winter tire in the dry, whatever the temperature, however in this test the summer tire had an impressively big advantage in the dry, stopping the car over seven meters before the best winter tire from just 100km/h (62mph.)
The Vredestein Wintrac was the best winter tire in the dry braking test, and placed fifth in dry handling maing it an impressive performance for the new Dutch tire.
- Reference Summer
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Reference Winter Budget
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
The budget winter tire actually performed ok in the dry tests, finishing midpack, where as the Fulda, BFGoodrich and Firestone tires struggled.
- Reference Summer
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Barum Polaris 5
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Reference Winter Budget
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Wet
In the wet, the winter tires performed better against the reference summer tire, with six winter patterns beating the summer tire in wet braking.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 continued its run of impressive wet braking results, stopping the test vehicle two meters ahead of the second placed Hankook, with the new Firestone WinterHawk 4 also performing well.
The budget winter tire really highlighted how poor value cheap winter tires can be, taking 14 meters longer to stop the car than the Bridgestone!
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Reference Summer
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Barum Polaris 5
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Reference Winter Budget
The summer tire reclaimed its lead in wet handling, narrowly beating the Hankook, Bridgestone and Vredestein winter tires.
- Reference Summer
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Michelin Alpin 6
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Barum Polaris 5
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Reference Winter Budget
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Reference Summer
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Reference Winter Budget
Snow
On average across the three snow tests, the BF Goodrich, Bridgestone, Continental and Hankook all has consistent results.
Snow braking had the Dunlop narrowly beating the Goodyear and Continental tires. The cheap budget tire continued to perform poorly.
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Barum Polaris 5
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Reference Winter Budget
- Reference Summer
Snow traction moved Bridgestone and Michelin to the top two places, with Continental remaining third.
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Reference Winter Budget
- Reference Summer
Hankook led BFGoodrich is the important snow handling test, with the Laufenn I Fit+ (a Hankook sub brand) also performing well.
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Barum Polaris 5
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Reference Winter Budget
Environment
Nexen, Hankook, Bridgestone and Vredestein were the only tires to beat the summer tire in the external noise test.
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Reference Summer
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Reference Winter Budget
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Barum and Nokian had a small lead over the rest of the tires on test when it came to fuel use, and five of the winter tires had a lower rolling resistance than the reference summer tire.
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Reference Summer
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Reference Winter Budget
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
Wear
The wear test once again highlighted just how far Continental have come in tread life compared to their tires five years ago by dominating the test and having a predicted 5,300km advantage over the second placed Michelin Alpin 6.
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Barum Polaris 5
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
The two best wearing tires on test were also the most expensive to buy.
- Barum Polaris 5
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Vredestein Wintrac
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Michelin Alpin 6
When comparing mileage against purchase price, the Barum Polaris 5 offered the lowest price per 1000/km, but even with the high purchase price, the Continental WinterContact TS870 was still the fifth best valuet yre overall.
- Barum Polaris 5
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Sava Eskimo HP2
- Firestone Winterhawk 4
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Nokian WR Snowproof
- Uniroyal MS Plus 77
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Kleber Krisalp HP3
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Laufenn I Fit Plus
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906
- Semperit Speed Grip 3
- Vredestein Wintrac
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Results
New winter tire with convincing characteristics in any weather. short braking distances, precise steering, good aquaplaning resistance, lowest wear on test.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
47.4 M |
37.9 M |
+9.5 M |
79.96% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
138.8 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
98.23% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
53.4 M |
50.2 M |
+3.2 M |
94.01% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
72 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.36% |
| Wet Circle |
8th |
12.77 s |
12.58 s |
+0.19 s |
98.51% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
82.3 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.4% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
3.38 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
27.7 M |
27.3 M |
+0.4 M |
98.56% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
2839 N |
2899 N |
-60 N |
97.93% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
57.3 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
98.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
70.6 dB |
69.7 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.73% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
1st |
45400 KM |
|
|
100% |
| Value |
5th |
8.37 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.48 Price/1000 |
82.32% |
| Price |
19th |
380 |
255 |
+125 |
67.11% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
7.94 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.73 kg / t |
90.81% |
Premium winter tires with balanced potential, good winter characteristics, convincing handling, low wear.
Slight understeer in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
45.9 M |
37.9 M |
+8 M |
82.57% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
137 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
96.96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
54.6 M |
50.2 M |
+4.4 M |
91.94% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
71.6 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.81% |
| Wet Circle |
15th |
12.95 s |
12.58 s |
+0.37 s |
97.14% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
78 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-6.5 Km/H |
92.31% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
3.09 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.29 m/sec2 |
91.42% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
15th |
29.1 M |
27.3 M |
+1.8 M |
93.81% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
2862 N |
2899 N |
-37 N |
98.72% |
| Snow Handling |
10th |
56.6 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
97.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
70.9 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.2 dB |
98.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
2nd |
40100 KM |
45400 KM |
-5300 KM |
88.33% |
| Value |
15th |
9.6 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+2.71 Price/1000 |
71.77% |
| Price |
20th |
385 |
255 |
+130 |
66.23% |
| Rolling Resistance |
15th |
8.75 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.54 kg / t |
82.4% |
Well priced tires with good winter performance, dynamic snow handling, good aquaplaning properties, low noise and good comfort.
Slight understeer in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
47.1 M |
37.9 M |
+9.2 M |
80.47% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
137.4 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
97.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
55.6 M |
50.2 M |
+5.4 M |
90.29% |
| Wet Handling |
13th |
70 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.2 Km/H |
95.63% |
| Wet Circle |
13th |
12.94 s |
12.58 s |
+0.36 s |
97.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
79.8 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-4.7 Km/H |
94.44% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
13th |
3.02 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.36 m/sec2 |
89.35% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
28.4 M |
27.3 M |
+1.1 M |
96.13% |
| Snow Traction |
10th |
2785 N |
2899 N |
-114 N |
96.07% |
| Snow Handling |
8th |
56.8 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
98.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
14th |
71.6 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.9 dB |
97.35% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
12th |
34100 KM |
45400 KM |
-11300 KM |
75.11% |
| Value |
9th |
8.65 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.76 Price/1000 |
79.65% |
| Price |
7th |
295 |
255 |
+40 |
86.44% |
| Rolling Resistance |
17th |
9.29 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+2.08 kg / t |
77.61% |
Convincing all rounder with dynamic driving on dry and wet roads, good steering, low rolling resistance.
Average mileage.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
45.1 M |
37.9 M |
+7.2 M |
84.04% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
138 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
97.66% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
52.4 M |
50.2 M |
+2.2 M |
95.8% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
72.9 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.59% |
| Wet Circle |
6th |
12.69 s |
12.58 s |
+0.11 s |
99.13% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
78.5 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-6 Km/H |
92.9% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
15th |
2.93 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.45 m/sec2 |
86.69% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
20th |
30.3 M |
27.3 M |
+3 M |
90.1% |
| Snow Traction |
18th |
2670 N |
2899 N |
-229 N |
92.1% |
| Snow Handling |
11th |
56.5 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
97.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.3 dB |
69.7 dB |
+0.6 dB |
99.15% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
15th |
31300 KM |
45400 KM |
-14100 KM |
68.94% |
| Value |
18th |
9.9 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+3.01 Price/1000 |
69.6% |
| Price |
12th |
310 |
255 |
+55 |
82.26% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
7.97 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.76 kg / t |
90.46% |
The winter king with the best driving performance on snow, good aquaplaning resistance, short wet braking, low noise.
High wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
16th |
48.3 M |
37.9 M |
+10.4 M |
78.47% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
137.9 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
97.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
50.2 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
72.9 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.59% |
| Wet Circle |
2nd |
12.59 s |
12.58 s |
+0.01 s |
99.92% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
81.7 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
96.69% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
3.2 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.18 m/sec2 |
94.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
28.1 M |
27.3 M |
+0.8 M |
97.15% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
2899 N |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
57.4 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.14% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
70.1 dB |
69.7 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
15th |
31300 KM |
45400 KM |
-14100 KM |
68.94% |
| Value |
19th |
11.02 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+4.13 Price/1000 |
62.52% |
| Price |
16th |
345 |
255 |
+90 |
73.91% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.18 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.97 kg / t |
88.14% |
Top performance in snow and wet conditions, very good aquaplaning resistance, short wet braking distances, well priced.
Understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
46 M |
37.9 M |
+8.1 M |
82.39% |
| Dry Handling |
17th |
136.5 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.8 Km/H |
96.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
52.2 M |
50.2 M |
+2 M |
96.17% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
73 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.73% |
| Wet Circle |
3rd |
12.64 s |
12.58 s |
+0.06 s |
99.53% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
84.5 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
3.18 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.2 m/sec2 |
94.08% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
28.2 M |
27.3 M |
+0.9 M |
96.81% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
2819 N |
2899 N |
-80 N |
97.24% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
57.9 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
69.8 dB |
69.7 dB |
+0.1 dB |
99.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
14th |
32900 KM |
45400 KM |
-12500 KM |
72.47% |
| Value |
13th |
9.27 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+2.38 Price/1000 |
74.33% |
| Price |
10th |
305 |
255 |
+50 |
83.61% |
| Rolling Resistance |
19th |
9.39 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+2.18 kg / t |
76.78% |
Convincing driving in the snow and on wet roads with stable handling, good comfort, good price to performance ratio.
Understeer in the dry.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
47.7 M |
37.9 M |
+9.8 M |
79.45% |
| Dry Handling |
20th |
135.8 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-5.5 Km/H |
96.11% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
55 M |
50.2 M |
+4.8 M |
91.27% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
71.7 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
97.95% |
| Wet Circle |
5th |
12.66 s |
12.58 s |
+0.08 s |
99.37% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
80.8 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
95.62% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
3.27 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.11 m/sec2 |
96.75% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
27.5 M |
27.3 M |
+0.2 M |
99.27% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
2836 N |
2899 N |
-63 N |
97.83% |
| Snow Handling |
12th |
56.4 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1.5 Km/H |
97.41% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
71.3 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.6 dB |
97.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
7th |
36600 KM |
45400 KM |
-8800 KM |
80.62% |
| Value |
10th |
8.74 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.85 Price/1000 |
78.83% |
| Price |
15th |
320 |
255 |
+65 |
79.69% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
8.25 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.04 kg / t |
87.39% |
Convincing driving in the snow and on wet roads with short braking, good comfort.
Slow steering, average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
14th |
47.8 M |
37.9 M |
+9.9 M |
79.29% |
| Dry Handling |
18th |
136.4 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.9 Km/H |
96.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
52.5 M |
50.2 M |
+2.3 M |
95.62% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
72.5 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.04% |
| Wet Circle |
3rd |
12.64 s |
12.58 s |
+0.06 s |
99.53% |
| Straight Aqua |
15th |
76.4 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-8.1 Km/H |
90.41% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
14th |
2.95 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.43 m/sec2 |
87.28% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
27.3 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
6th |
2830 N |
2899 N |
-69 N |
97.62% |
| Snow Handling |
9th |
56.7 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
97.93% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
18th |
72.3 dB |
69.7 dB |
+2.6 dB |
96.4% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
18th |
30700 KM |
45400 KM |
-14700 KM |
67.62% |
| Value |
20th |
11.56 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+4.67 Price/1000 |
59.6% |
| Price |
17th |
355 |
255 |
+100 |
71.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
8.53 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.32 kg / t |
84.53% |
Short snow braking, dynamic dry handling, low noise, low wear.
Average snow performance, long dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
18th |
48.7 M |
37.9 M |
+10.8 M |
77.82% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
137.3 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
97.17% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
54.9 M |
50.2 M |
+4.7 M |
91.44% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
69.8 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
95.36% |
| Wet Circle |
16th |
12.99 s |
12.58 s |
+0.41 s |
96.84% |
| Straight Aqua |
14th |
76.5 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-8 Km/H |
90.53% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
3.11 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.27 m/sec2 |
92.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
28.5 M |
27.3 M |
+1.2 M |
95.79% |
| Snow Traction |
17th |
2701 N |
2899 N |
-198 N |
93.17% |
| Snow Handling |
18th |
54.9 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
94.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
71.3 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.6 dB |
97.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
8th |
36200 KM |
45400 KM |
-9200 KM |
79.74% |
| Value |
17th |
9.81 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+2.92 Price/1000 |
70.23% |
| Price |
17th |
355 |
255 |
+100 |
71.83% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
8.36 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.15 kg / t |
86.24% |
Very good winter characteristics, short snow and wet braking, low wear, well priced.
Understeer in the dry with long dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
21st |
49.3 M |
37.9 M |
+11.4 M |
76.88% |
| Dry Handling |
19th |
136.1 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-5.2 Km/H |
96.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
52.4 M |
50.2 M |
+2.2 M |
95.8% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
71.8 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
98.09% |
| Wet Circle |
12th |
12.93 s |
12.58 s |
+0.35 s |
97.29% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
79.9 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-4.6 Km/H |
94.56% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
18th |
2.91 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.47 m/sec2 |
86.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
28.6 M |
27.3 M |
+1.3 M |
95.45% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
2839 N |
2899 N |
-60 N |
97.93% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
57.2 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
98.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
6th |
70.5 dB |
69.7 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.87% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
10th |
36100 KM |
45400 KM |
-9300 KM |
79.52% |
| Value |
4th |
8.17 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.28 Price/1000 |
84.33% |
| Price |
7th |
295 |
255 |
+40 |
86.44% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.08 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.87 kg / t |
89.23% |
Good grip on ice and snow, stable wet handling, good aquaplaning resistance.
Slow steering.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
17th |
48.4 M |
37.9 M |
+10.5 M |
78.31% |
| Dry Handling |
22nd |
135.4 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-5.9 Km/H |
95.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
55.6 M |
50.2 M |
+5.4 M |
90.29% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
71.4 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.54% |
| Wet Circle |
9th |
12.85 s |
12.58 s |
+0.27 s |
97.9% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80.2 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
94.91% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
11th |
3.07 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.31 m/sec2 |
90.83% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
27.9 M |
27.3 M |
+0.6 M |
97.85% |
| Snow Traction |
12th |
2774 N |
2899 N |
-125 N |
95.69% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
57.5 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
15th |
71.8 dB |
69.7 dB |
+2.1 dB |
97.08% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
13th |
33900 KM |
45400 KM |
-11500 KM |
74.67% |
| Value |
14th |
9.29 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+2.4 Price/1000 |
74.17% |
| Price |
13th |
315 |
255 |
+60 |
80.95% |
| Rolling Resistance |
18th |
9.34 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+2.13 kg / t |
77.19% |
Stable wet and dry handling, good aquaplaning resistance, low wear.
Moderate winter abilities with high levels of understeer, long wet braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
47.9 M |
37.9 M |
+10 M |
79.12% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
137.5 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
97.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
16th |
56.4 M |
50.2 M |
+6.2 M |
89.01% |
| Wet Handling |
12th |
70.2 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
95.9% |
| Wet Circle |
13th |
12.94 s |
12.58 s |
+0.36 s |
97.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
77.6 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-6.9 Km/H |
91.83% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
3.12 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.26 m/sec2 |
92.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
28.6 M |
27.3 M |
+1.3 M |
95.45% |
| Snow Traction |
16th |
2704 N |
2899 N |
-195 N |
93.27% |
| Snow Handling |
19th |
54.6 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
94.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
22nd |
73.7 dB |
69.7 dB |
+4 dB |
94.57% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
6th |
36800 KM |
45400 KM |
-8600 KM |
81.06% |
| Value |
7th |
8.56 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.67 Price/1000 |
80.49% |
| Price |
13th |
315 |
255 |
+60 |
80.95% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
8.46 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.25 kg / t |
85.22% |
Balanced grip in the wet and dry, good mileage, safe aquaplaning.
Limited winter ability, slow steering and long braking distances in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
46.4 M |
37.9 M |
+8.5 M |
81.68% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
137.4 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
97.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
18th |
56.6 M |
50.2 M |
+6.4 M |
88.69% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
71.2 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.27% |
| Wet Circle |
7th |
12.73 s |
12.58 s |
+0.15 s |
98.82% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
79.2 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-5.3 Km/H |
93.73% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
3.09 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.29 m/sec2 |
91.42% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
19th |
29.5 M |
27.3 M |
+2.2 M |
92.54% |
| Snow Traction |
20th |
2598 N |
2899 N |
-301 N |
89.62% |
| Snow Handling |
16th |
55.3 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
95.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
19th |
72.7 dB |
69.7 dB |
+3 dB |
95.87% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
11th |
34800 KM |
45400 KM |
-10600 KM |
76.65% |
| Value |
8th |
8.62 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.73 Price/1000 |
79.93% |
| Price |
9th |
300 |
255 |
+45 |
85% |
| Rolling Resistance |
21st |
9.48 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+2.27 kg / t |
76.05% |
Short braking and good handling in the dry, good comfort, well priced.
Understeer in the snow, long wet braking, average wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
47.6 M |
37.9 M |
+9.7 M |
79.62% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
138 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
97.66% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
56.1 M |
50.2 M |
+5.9 M |
89.48% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
69.8 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
95.36% |
| Wet Circle |
10th |
12.87 s |
12.58 s |
+0.29 s |
97.75% |
| Straight Aqua |
16th |
75.3 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-9.2 Km/H |
89.11% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
12th |
3.05 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.33 m/sec2 |
90.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
16th |
29.2 M |
27.3 M |
+1.9 M |
93.49% |
| Snow Traction |
15th |
2727 N |
2899 N |
-172 N |
94.07% |
| Snow Handling |
14th |
55.6 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
96.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
71.3 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.6 dB |
97.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
19th |
29700 KM |
45400 KM |
-15700 KM |
65.42% |
| Value |
16th |
9.76 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+2.87 Price/1000 |
70.59% |
| Price |
5th |
290 |
255 |
+35 |
87.93% |
| Rolling Resistance |
22nd |
9.51 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+2.3 kg / t |
75.81% |
Good winter grip, low wear, low rolling resistance.
Low aquaplaning resistance, long wet and dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
19th |
49.1 M |
37.9 M |
+11.2 M |
77.19% |
| Dry Handling |
13th |
136.8 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.5 Km/H |
96.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
16th |
56.4 M |
50.2 M |
+6.2 M |
89.01% |
| Wet Handling |
14th |
69.9 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
95.49% |
| Wet Circle |
11th |
12.9 s |
12.58 s |
+0.32 s |
97.52% |
| Straight Aqua |
18th |
73.9 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-10.6 Km/H |
87.46% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
20th |
2.7 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.68 m/sec2 |
79.88% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
14th |
28.8 M |
27.3 M |
+1.5 M |
94.79% |
| Snow Traction |
13th |
2760 N |
2899 N |
-139 N |
95.21% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
56.9 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
17th |
72.2 dB |
69.7 dB |
+2.5 dB |
96.54% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
5th |
37000 KM |
45400 KM |
-8400 KM |
81.5% |
| Value |
1st |
6.89 Price/1000 |
|
|
100% |
| Price |
1st |
255 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.21 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Good traction and short braking in the snow, very low wear, low price.
Understeer and long wet and dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
22nd |
49.6 M |
37.9 M |
+11.7 M |
76.41% |
| Dry Handling |
21st |
135.7 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-5.6 Km/H |
96.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
21st |
57.5 M |
50.2 M |
+7.3 M |
87.3% |
| Wet Handling |
19th |
69.4 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
94.81% |
| Wet Circle |
21st |
13.2 s |
12.58 s |
+0.62 s |
95.3% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
76.9 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-7.6 Km/H |
91.01% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
3.15 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.23 m/sec2 |
93.2% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
28.6 M |
27.3 M |
+1.3 M |
95.45% |
| Snow Traction |
9th |
2818 N |
2899 N |
-81 N |
97.21% |
| Snow Handling |
20th |
54.5 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
94.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
20th |
72.8 dB |
69.7 dB |
+3.1 dB |
95.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
3rd |
39700 KM |
45400 KM |
-5700 KM |
87.44% |
| Value |
2nd |
7.3 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+0.41 Price/1000 |
94.38% |
| Price |
5th |
290 |
255 |
+35 |
87.93% |
| Rolling Resistance |
13th |
8.48 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.27 kg / t |
85.02% |
Good traction and short braking distances in the snow, low wear, low price.
Moderate wet grip, understeer wet handling, long wet and dry braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
19th |
49.1 M |
37.9 M |
+11.2 M |
77.19% |
| Dry Handling |
13th |
136.8 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.5 Km/H |
96.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
19th |
57.1 M |
50.2 M |
+6.9 M |
87.92% |
| Wet Handling |
20th |
69.1 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-4.1 Km/H |
94.4% |
| Wet Circle |
20th |
13.17 s |
12.58 s |
+0.59 s |
95.52% |
| Straight Aqua |
19th |
73.7 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-10.8 Km/H |
87.22% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
15th |
2.93 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.45 m/sec2 |
86.69% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
28 M |
27.3 M |
+0.7 M |
97.5% |
| Snow Traction |
11th |
2784 N |
2899 N |
-115 N |
96.03% |
| Snow Handling |
14th |
55.6 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
96.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
16th |
71.9 dB |
69.7 dB |
+2.2 dB |
96.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
4th |
37200 KM |
45400 KM |
-8200 KM |
81.94% |
| Value |
3rd |
7.39 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+0.5 Price/1000 |
93.23% |
| Price |
3rd |
275 |
255 |
+20 |
92.73% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.16 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.95 kg / t |
88.36% |
Balance grip in the dry, low wear, low rolling resistance.
Limited grip in the wet and on snow, average aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
46.2 M |
37.9 M |
+8.3 M |
82.03% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
139 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
98.37% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
19th |
57.1 M |
50.2 M |
+6.9 M |
87.92% |
| Wet Handling |
21st |
68 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-5.2 Km/H |
92.9% |
| Wet Circle |
18th |
13.04 s |
12.58 s |
+0.46 s |
96.47% |
| Straight Aqua |
19th |
73.7 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-10.8 Km/H |
87.22% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
17th |
2.92 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.46 m/sec2 |
86.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
16th |
29.2 M |
27.3 M |
+1.9 M |
93.49% |
| Snow Traction |
14th |
2738 N |
2899 N |
-161 N |
94.45% |
| Snow Handling |
17th |
55.1 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
95.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
71.1 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.4 dB |
98.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
8th |
36200 KM |
45400 KM |
-9200 KM |
79.74% |
| Value |
6th |
8.43 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.54 Price/1000 |
81.73% |
| Price |
10th |
305 |
255 |
+50 |
83.61% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.38 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.17 kg / t |
97.7% |
Short snow braking, good comfort, low price.
Understeer in all conditions, high wear, low aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
46.4 M |
37.9 M |
+8.5 M |
81.68% |
| Dry Handling |
16th |
136.6 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.7 Km/H |
96.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
55.6 M |
50.2 M |
+5.4 M |
90.29% |
| Wet Handling |
17th |
69.5 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
94.95% |
| Wet Circle |
19th |
13.06 s |
12.58 s |
+0.48 s |
96.32% |
| Straight Aqua |
17th |
74.5 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-10 Km/H |
88.17% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
21st |
2.57 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.81 m/sec2 |
76.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
18th |
29.4 M |
27.3 M |
+2.1 M |
92.86% |
| Snow Traction |
19th |
2648 N |
2899 N |
-251 N |
91.34% |
| Snow Handling |
13th |
56 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
96.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
69.7 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
20th |
28500 KM |
45400 KM |
-16900 KM |
62.78% |
| Value |
12th |
8.95 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+2.06 Price/1000 |
76.98% |
| Price |
1st |
255 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
16th |
9.09 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.88 kg / t |
79.32% |
Good winter grip, god dry handling, low price.
Very low aquaplaning resistance, poor wet grip, high wear.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
46 M |
37.9 M |
+8.1 M |
82.39% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
138.7 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
98.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
55 M |
50.2 M |
+4.8 M |
91.27% |
| Wet Handling |
17th |
69.5 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
94.95% |
| Wet Circle |
17th |
13.03 s |
12.58 s |
+0.45 s |
96.55% |
| Straight Aqua |
21st |
72.4 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-12.1 Km/H |
85.68% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
22nd |
2.32 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-1.06 m/sec2 |
68.64% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
28.6 M |
27.3 M |
+1.3 M |
95.45% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
2823 N |
2899 N |
-76 N |
97.38% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
57.5 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
13th |
71.4 dB |
69.7 dB |
+1.7 dB |
97.62% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
17th |
31200 KM |
45400 KM |
-14200 KM |
68.72% |
| Value |
11th |
8.81 Price/1000 |
6.89 Price/1000 |
+1.92 Price/1000 |
78.21% |
| Price |
3rd |
275 |
255 |
+20 |
92.73% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.23 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+1.02 kg / t |
87.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
47.6 M |
37.9 M |
+9.7 M |
79.62% |
| Dry Handling |
15th |
136.7 Km/H |
141.3 Km/H |
-4.6 Km/H |
96.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
22nd |
64.8 M |
50.2 M |
+14.6 M |
77.47% |
| Wet Handling |
22nd |
63.8 Km/H |
73.2 Km/H |
-9.4 Km/H |
87.16% |
| Wet Circle |
22nd |
13.75 s |
12.58 s |
+1.17 s |
91.49% |
| Straight Aqua |
22nd |
68.6 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-15.9 Km/H |
81.18% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
18th |
2.91 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.47 m/sec2 |
86.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
21st |
33.8 M |
27.3 M |
+6.5 M |
80.77% |
| Snow Traction |
21st |
2158 N |
2899 N |
-741 N |
74.44% |
| Snow Handling |
21st |
53.9 Km/H |
57.9 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
93.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
21st |
73.3 dB |
69.7 dB |
+3.6 dB |
95.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
20th |
9.46 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+2.25 kg / t |
76.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
37.9 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
141.3 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
54.3 M |
50.2 M |
+4.1 M |
92.45% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
73.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Circle |
1st |
12.58 s |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
78.3 Km/H |
84.5 Km/H |
-6.2 Km/H |
92.66% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
3.22 m/sec2 |
3.38 m/sec2 |
-0.16 m/sec2 |
95.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
22nd |
46.2 M |
27.3 M |
+18.9 M |
59.09% |
| Snow Traction |
22nd |
734 N |
2899 N |
-2165 N |
25.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
70.4 dB |
69.7 dB |
+0.7 dB |
99.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.16 kg / t |
7.21 kg / t |
+0.95 kg / t |
88.36% |