Kumho Ecowing ES31 Reviews - Page 2
Given 87%
while driving a
Peugeot 206 1.4 75hp
(175/65 R14)
on mostly motorways
for 3,000 average miles
I bought four of these tires for my 2003 Peugeot 206. The ADAC spoke positively about this tire and reviews on this site about this tire were positive too. Together with the low price of this tire I thought I couldn't go wrong.
And I wasn't wrong! These tires are good! Especially in the dry as the tests confirmed. Very responsive steering, and no under or over steer in sharp corners at all. Very impressed!
When it comes to the wet these tires are great too. Stable and more than enough grip when cornering sharp on wet roads.
Only downside is these tires slip easily when taking an extreme sharp corner from stand still on wet concrete parking lot floors. I hope you know what I mean.
Confort great too! But sometimes a little bit hard on ledges and ridges but nothing serious.
Noise a little bit too much in my opinion especially on rough tarmac but I need to be careful with this claim as it could also be my car lacking proper sound insulation ofc.
Wear? 2.000 km is too early to say something about it.
Will I buy these tires again? I think I will!! Even though these tires are Made in China, they perform very very well. Don't let that be a reason not to buy these guys. Cheers.
And I wasn't wrong! These tires are good! Especially in the dry as the tests confirmed. Very responsive steering, and no under or over steer in sharp corners at all. Very impressed!
When it comes to the wet these tires are great too. Stable and more than enough grip when cornering sharp on wet roads.
Only downside is these tires slip easily when taking an extreme sharp corner from stand still on wet concrete parking lot floors. I hope you know what I mean.
Confort great too! But sometimes a little bit hard on ledges and ridges but nothing serious.
Noise a little bit too much in my opinion especially on rough tarmac but I need to be careful with this claim as it could also be my car lacking proper sound insulation ofc.
Wear? 2.000 km is too early to say something about it.
Will I buy these tires again? I think I will!! Even though these tires are Made in China, they perform very very well. Don't let that be a reason not to buy these guys. Cheers.
Toyota Corolla AE101
(165/70 R14)
on mostly country roads
for 6 average miles
Noise 9/10, Very good in dry roads 9/10, good in wet 7/10, wear 7/10.
Given 69%
while driving a
Hyundai i30 CRDi
(195/65 R15)
on a combination of roads
for 1,000 average miles
Great tires in the dry. Noticable noise reduction and more comfortable than budget tires. Some unsettled behaviour in the wet during cornering but much improved over the sumitomo tires that were fitted when I bought the car.
Given 80%
while driving a
Alfa Romeo GT 1.8 TS
(205/55 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 32,000 easy going miles
Very goot tires overall, still in good shape after 51.000+ km, planning to keep them for about another 5000 or 6000 km. Good comfort and grip, hot and cold, dry and wet.
Given 61%
while driving a
Volkswagen Golf 1.9 Tdi
(205/55 R16)
on mostly country roads
for 2,000 spirited miles
Replaced hankook with Kumho.
Very poor grip on both wet and dry. Good comfort but will not buy again.
Given 89%
while driving a
Honda Jazz
(185/60 R15)
on a combination of roads
for 26,000 average miles
Great value tire. Handles as well as the Michelin tires that were on the car before, but a lot cheaper on price. An additional benefit is that they haven't started to perish, which the Michelin tires suffered from.
Given 77%
while driving a
Citroën C4
(205/55 R16)
on a combination of roads
for 20,000 easy going miles
these tires are very good. The only problem so far is the shoulders are too weak. So beware of pavement borders, potholes. I destroyed two tires already, now I'm trying XL (extraload) ones, hoping the shoulders are tougher. Also, if you drive too fast on corners, tires tend to "eat" the border because of the shoulders I said. Before I used kumho ku31 ecsta sport: excellent tires, never had a problem but they were very noisy and tend to step. Also, they wore very slowly because they became very hard after some years. Conclusion: ecowing are excellent, but too weak on the shoulders.
Given 85%
while driving a
Volvo V40 T3 Cross country
(205/60 R16 H)
on a combination of roads
for 2,000 miles
Had all 4 put on volvo v40 replacing michellin must say not alot of difference apart from in the wet michellin scrape it but price wise kumho are #1 reduce road noise handling is on par would I buy these tires again? Too right I will
Given 86%
while driving a
Honda Jazz
(185/60 R15 H)
on a combination of roads
for 7,000 easy going miles
The three year old car came with half worn Michelin tires however the pressure warning sensor kept being triggered. So I decided to try replacing the tires. Four of these tires fitted for just over £200 seemed a good deal. In fact I've been really impressed by these tires, they seem better than the Michelin's. Cheaper, don't trigger the pressure sensors and only 1mm of wear in 7000 miles. These tires also slightly improved my mpg.
Given 70%
while driving a
SEAT Ibiza TSi
(185/65 R15 H)
on mostly town
for 2,000 spirited miles
Reasonable OE tires that came with my Seat Ibiza MY2020.
Nothing spectacular but certainly not bad.
Unfortunately one of them got damaged and it was incredibly hard to get a replacement, availability is pretty bad at least where I live.
I had to sell the rest and upgrade all 4 tires to an Efficientgrip Performance 2, seperate review on that one.
Given 83%
while driving a
Ford Focus MK1
(195/60 R15 H)
on a combination of roads
for 500 easy going miles
I bought these tires to replace some Goodyear Efficient Grip tires, as the price of those tires has increased substantially since I last bought some, probably 3-4 years ago. The Kumho's were significantly cheaper, but I had read good things about them so thought I would give them a try.
I haven't noticed any difference in performance compared to the Goodyear tires. The Kumho's seem to grip just as well in wet or dry conditions. One thing I can say is that the car rides much better over bumpy surfaces, the old GY tires were sometimes a bit crashy. The Kumho's are also noticeably quieter with less droning on certain types of tarmac.
I can't comment on how well they will wear as they have only been on two weeks, but I did get 3-4 years out of the old GY tires before they were ready for replacement, hopefully the Kumho's will last just as long!
So, overall I am impressed, the tires drive just as well, are quieter, and were significantly cheaper. When the back tires are ready for changing, I'll definitely get the same again.
I haven't noticed any difference in performance compared to the Goodyear tires. The Kumho's seem to grip just as well in wet or dry conditions. One thing I can say is that the car rides much better over bumpy surfaces, the old GY tires were sometimes a bit crashy. The Kumho's are also noticeably quieter with less droning on certain types of tarmac.
I can't comment on how well they will wear as they have only been on two weeks, but I did get 3-4 years out of the old GY tires before they were ready for replacement, hopefully the Kumho's will last just as long!
So, overall I am impressed, the tires drive just as well, are quieter, and were significantly cheaper. When the back tires are ready for changing, I'll definitely get the same again.
Given 64%
while driving a
Vauxhall zafira 1.9 cdti 150 bhp
(205/55 R16 V)
on a combination of roads
for 5,000 easy going miles
Had the new tires for a year now, original tires were bridgstone turanza. The first thing i noticed was how quiet the vehicle was with increased levels of comfort, especially when crossing speed humps, much more compliant. I undertake some long motorway journeys, monthly and recorded significant improvement to the fuel economy app 5/6mpg ( cruising around 65mph). Too early to comment on wear and tire life but it's looks promising.
i think they are good value for the money!
i think they are good value for the money!